Comparison Overview

Emily Dickinson Museum

VS

Smack Mellon

Emily Dickinson Museum

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Emily Dickinson Museum is an international destination devoted to celebrating Dickinson’s life and work by preserving and interpreting her family homestead and by bringing alive her startling poetic voice. The Homestead and The Evergreens are unique in their associations with Dickinson. This is the place where she composed 1,800 of the greatest poems in the English language, poetry that has elevated her to the first rank among poets worldwide. The Museum creates a variety of memorable ways to experience Dickinson’s historical and literary life and to appreciate her legacy. The spaces in the buildings and on the grounds, and the material life they contain, propel our visitors into Dickinson’s social, cultural, and familial world. Her poetry helps them transcend, as she did, the constraints of the physical world. Emily Dickinson deserves excellence in our operations, educational outreach, innovative programming, and stewardship of the buildings, grounds, and collections. And that’s what we strive to do.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smack Mellon

92 Plymouth Street , Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Smack Mellon is a nonprofit arts organization located in DUMBO, Brooklyn. Smack Mellon’s mission is to nurture and support emerging, under-recognized mid-career, and women artists in the creation and exhibition of new work, by providing exhibition opportunities, studio workspace, and access to equipment and technical assistance for the realization of ambitious projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emily-dickinson-museum.jpeg
Emily Dickinson Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smack-mellon-gallery.jpeg
Smack Mellon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emily Dickinson Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smack Mellon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emily Dickinson Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smack Mellon in 2026.

Incident History — Emily Dickinson Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emily Dickinson Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smack Mellon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smack Mellon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emily-dickinson-museum.jpeg
Emily Dickinson Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smack-mellon-gallery.jpeg
Smack Mellon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emily Dickinson Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smack Mellon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smack Mellon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Emily Dickinson Museum company.

In the current year, Smack Mellon company and Emily Dickinson Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smack Mellon company nor Emily Dickinson Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smack Mellon company nor Emily Dickinson Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smack Mellon company nor Emily Dickinson Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum company nor Smack Mellon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum company nor Smack Mellon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Emily Dickinson Museum company employs more people globally than Smack Mellon company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emily Dickinson Museum nor Smack Mellon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.