Comparison Overview

University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center

VS

Allegheny Health Network

University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center

Elyria, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1908, University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center is a 387-licensed bed hospital with additional campuses in Amherst (University Hospitals Amherst Health Center), Avon (University Hospitals Avon Health Center) and Sheffield (University Hospitals Sheffield Health Center), along with medical offices in Grafton, North Ridgeville and Westlake. A state-of-the-art fitness center, along with physician offices, rehabilitation, outpatient testing and a full-service 24/7 ER are located within the UH Avon Health Center. The Center for Health & Fitness is one of Northeast Ohio’s first medically-based fitness centers, and offers more than 115 weekly group exercise classes, senior programs, a day spa, and more. The UH Amherst Health Center features a full-service 24/7 ER to serve the emergency needs of the community. Also on-site is a dedicated radiology department for 24-hour X-ray, CAT scan and Ultrasound; as well as an around-the-clock laboratory.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 346
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Allegheny Health Network

4800 Friendship Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15224
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Allegheny Health Network is an integrated health care delivery system serving the greater Western Pennsylvania region. More than 2,600 physicians and 21,000 employees serve the system's 14 hospitals as well as its ambulatory medical and surgery centers, Health + Wellness Pavilions, and hundreds of physician practice locations. AHN is a proud part of Highmark Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,374
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emh-regional-medical-center.jpeg
University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allegheny Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegheny Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allegheny Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegheny Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emh-regional-medical-center.jpeg
University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Takeover
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allegheny Health Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allegheny Health Network company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company.

In the current year, Allegheny Health Network company and University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allegheny Health Network company nor University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Allegheny Health Network company and University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Allegheny Health Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company nor Allegheny Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allegheny Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company.

Allegheny Health Network company employs more people globally than University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University Hospitals Elyria Medical Center nor Allegheny Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H