Comparison Overview

Emerson Health

VS

Allina Health

Emerson Health

133 Old Road To Nine Acre Corner, None, Concord, MA, US, 01742
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Emerson Hospital has proudly served our community for more than a century. With hundreds of doctors serving over 300,000 patients across the region, we have grown to be more than a hospital you go to when you are sick. We are here to keep you well. At Emerson, our strong connection to our community and patients enables us to deliver the best possible care. We know Emerson is special. That is why we rebranded to tell our story. We are Emerson Health, and we are proud to serve our community with excellence, personalized. EMERSON HEALTH — EXCELLENCE PERSONALIZED It is easy to feel lost in the world of healthcare. When you need help, you want professionals who bring their best and understand you. The expertise you are looking for is available right here, close to home. At Emerson Health:​ We understand that healthcare is personal. ​ We put patients first. ​ We take time to listen. ​ We see our patients as people, not their condition. ​ We are here for patients through every stage of life. Our new logo reflects the care continuum, starting at the center and taking us through life’s journey. ​Our green colors represent our commitment​ to personalized care, and our blue colors reflect the excellence that we deliver.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,563
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Allina Health

The Commons at Midtown Exchange, 2925 Chicago Ave., Minneapolis, MN, US, 55407
Last Update: 2025-12-01

People at Allina Health have a career of making a difference in the lives of the millions of patients we see each year at our 90+ clinics, 12 hospitals and through a wide variety of specialty care services in Minnesota and western Wisconsin. We’re a not-for-profit organization committed to enriching your career by providing ongoing training, competitive compensation, support for work-life balance and ways to give back to the communities we serve. Join our team of 29,000+ employees – your career opportunities are limitless!

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,869
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emerson-hospital.jpeg
Emerson Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emerson Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allina Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emerson Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allina Health in 2025.

Incident History — Emerson Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emerson Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allina Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allina Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emerson-hospital.jpeg
Emerson Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Emerson Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allina Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Emerson Health and Allina Health have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Allina Health company and Emerson Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Allina Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Emerson Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Emerson Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Allina Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allina Health company nor Emerson Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emerson Health company nor Allina Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Emerson Health company nor Allina Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allina Health company employs more people globally than Emerson Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emerson Health nor Allina Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X