Comparison Overview

Emergency Communications Network

VS

Indra

Emergency Communications Network

780 W. Granada Boulevard, Ormond Beach, 32174, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 0 and 549

Effective June 5, 2017 Emergency Communications Network (ECN) has changed to OnSolve. Combining ECN, MIR3 and SendWordNow, establishes OnSolve as the market leader in cloud-based communication and collaboration tools for delivering critical notifications, enhancing business continuity, and improving enterprise-wide productivity. Please follow OnSolve for all future updates and posts and visit us online at www.onsolve.com to learn more. --------- Emergency Communications Network (ECN) is the leading provider of Software as a Service (SaaS) technology designed to help public and private sector enterprises keep employees, citizens, and stakeholders better informed and safe across the United States and Canada. Our sophisticated infrastructure allows our clients – many of whom have been with us for more than a decade – to deliver thousands of critical messages within minutes via voice, text, email, social media, and mobile app alerts. ECN has invested millions of dollars in its infrastructure to ensure clients have access to our services 24/7/365, without fail, from anywhere. ECN Launcher allows authorized personnel to initiate messages from anywhere via smartphones or tablets, giving agencies, departments and businesses the power to communicate to the right people, at the right time, regardless of the situation. Our flagship product CodeRED®, enables local government and public safety officials to communicate time-sensitive, personalized messages using a multimodal approach to its residents and staff. Our SmartNotice® solution serves as a business continuity tool to disseminate critical information to employees or other stakeholders in an easy, reliable, and affordable manner. ECN is headquartered in Ormond Beach, Florida and remains committed to its mission to help alert, inform and affect lives.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Alcobendas, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28108
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Indra (www.indracompany.com) is one of the leading global defence, aerospace and technology companies, and a world leader in digital transformation and information technologies in Spain and Latin America through its subsidiary, Minsait. Its business model is based on a comprehensive range of proprietary products, with high-value approach and a significant innovative component, making it the technological partner for the digitalization and key operations of its clients around the world. Sustainability forms part of its strategy and culture in order to overcome current-day and future social and environmental challenges. In the 2023 fiscal year, Indra achieved revenue totaling €4.343 billion, with more than 57,000 employees, a local presence in 46 countries and business operations in over 140 countries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 38,194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emergency-communications-network-llc.jpeg
Emergency Communications Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emergency Communications Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Emergency Communications Network has 2677.78% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indra in 2025.

Incident History — Emergency Communications Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emergency Communications Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emergency-communications-network-llc.jpeg
Emergency Communications Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Emergency Communications Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Emergency Communications Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indra company has not reported any.

In the current year, Emergency Communications Network company has reported more cyber incidents than Indra company.

Emergency Communications Network company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Indra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Indra company nor Emergency Communications Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Emergency Communications Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Emergency Communications Network company nor Indra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Emergency Communications Network company nor Indra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indra company employs more people globally than Emergency Communications Network company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emergency Communications Network nor Indra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H