Comparison Overview

EMC Life

VS

MetLife

EMC Life

699 Walnut, Suite 1100, None, Des Moines, Iowa, US, 50309
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 700 and 749

EMC Life is dedicated to keeping insurance human by offering life insurance solutions that protect hopes and dreams. Products are underwritten by EMC National Life Company.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

MetLife

200 Park Ave, None, New York, NY, US, 10166
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 650 and 699

We live in a time of unprecedented change. A time when economies, regulations, and social safety nets are all in flux. Customers around the globe have told us they’re overwhelmed by the pace of change and are looking for a trusted partner to help them manage life’s twists and turns. MetLife is committed to being that partner. That’s why we’re transforming our business: Delivering greater value for the people we serve by becoming a simpler, more focused, and future-facing company. We’ll be introducing new ways to meet our customers’ evolving needs, with flexible products; simpler, more intuitive experiences and a range of new services. MetLife. Navigating life together. For customer service: https://www.metlife.com/support-and-manage/contact-us/ For social media notices: https://www.metlife.com/about-us/terms-and-conditions/social-media/ MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), through its subsidiaries and affiliates (“MetLife”), is one of the world’s leading financial services companies, providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management to help its individual and institutional customers navigate their changing world. Founded in 1868, MetLife has operations in more than 40 markets globally and holds leading positions in the United States, Japan, Latin America, Asia, Europe and the Middle East.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 42,313
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emc-national-life-company.jpeg
EMC Life
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metlife.jpeg
MetLife
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EMC Life
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MetLife
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMC Life in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

MetLife has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — EMC Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMC Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MetLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emc-national-life-company.jpeg
EMC Life
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metlife.jpeg
MetLife
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Coding Transmission Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

EMC Life company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MetLife company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MetLife company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to EMC Life company.

In the current year, MetLife company has reported more cyber incidents than EMC Life company.

MetLife company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while EMC Life company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both MetLife company and EMC Life company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither MetLife company nor EMC Life company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EMC Life company nor MetLife company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both MetLife company and EMC Life company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

MetLife company employs more people globally than EMC Life company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EMC Life nor MetLife holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N