Comparison Overview

EMC Life

VS

AIG

EMC Life

699 Walnut, Suite 1100, None, Des Moines, Iowa, US, 50309
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 700 and 749

EMC Life is dedicated to keeping insurance human by offering life insurance solutions that protect hopes and dreams. Products are underwritten by EMC National Life Company.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

AIG

1271 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 41, New York, NY, US, 10020-1304
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 800 and 849

American International Group, Inc. (NYSE: AIG) is a leading global insurance organization. AIG provides insurance solutions that help businesses and individuals in approximately 190 countries and jurisdictions protect their assets and manage risks through AIG operations and network partners. Additional information about AIG can be found at www.aig.com | https://www.youtube.com/aig | https://twitter.com/aiginsurance | https://www.linkedin.com/company/aig/ | https://www.facebook.com/AIGInsurance | http://www.instagram.com/aiginsurance/ AIG is the marketing name for the worldwide property-casualty and general insurance operations of American International Group, Inc. All products and services are written or provided by subsidiaries or affiliates of American International Group, Inc. Products or services may not be available in all countries and jurisdictions, and coverage is subject to underwriting requirements and actual policy language. Non-insurance products and services may be provided by independent third parties. Certain property-casualty coverages may be provided by a surplus lines insurer. Surplus lines insurers do not generally participate in state guaranty funds, and insureds are therefore not protected by such funds. AIG Social Media Community Guidelines: https://www.aig.com/home/about/social-media-guidelines

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 27,538
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emc-national-life-company.jpeg
EMC Life
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aig.jpeg
AIG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EMC Life
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AIG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMC Life in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIG in 2025.

Incident History — EMC Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMC Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AIG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emc-national-life-company.jpeg
EMC Life
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aig.jpeg
AIG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AIG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EMC Life company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EMC Life company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AIG company has not reported any.

In the current year, AIG company and EMC Life company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AIG company nor EMC Life company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EMC Life company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AIG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AIG company nor EMC Life company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EMC Life company nor AIG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AIG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EMC Life company.

AIG company employs more people globally than EMC Life company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EMC Life nor AIG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N