Comparison Overview

Ember Health

VS

Life Management Resources

Ember Health

26 Court St, Brooklyn, New York, 11242, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

We provide safe, effective ketamine therapy for people seeking relief from depression We founded Ember Health because we were frustrated by the lack of effective medical treatment options for the millions of people struggling with severe depression. We know we share this feeling with the thousands of compassionate mental healthcare professionals who provide critical counsel to their patients. They desire better, more reliable complements to their care. We believe ketamine is a powerful answer to this need: Whereas fewer than 30% of patients on traditional antidepressants realize relief of their depressive symptoms, low-dose infusions of ketamine have shown an average of 75% improvement in depression. While oral antidepressant medication can take six to eight weeks to take effect and have unwanted side effects, ketamine takes effect almost immediately after administration, with minimal, if any, harmful effect. Join as at https://emberhealth.co/ to learn more.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Life Management Resources

5068 W Plano Pkwy, Plano, 75093, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Life Management Resources Is an Outpatient alcohol and drug rehabilitation program serving adults in the Collin County, Denton County, and North Dallas area. Through our Online Treatment programs, we reach those in need across the State of Texas. Life Management Resources is licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services and is Nationally Accredited by the Joint Hospital Accreditation Commission. LMR was founded in 1999 by Dr. Fred J. Hansen, Ph.D., to serve the metro area that was unserved following the closure of Charter Psychiatric Hospital. Since 1999 LMR has served over 18,000 patients and has one of the highest recovery rates in the country. In 2007, LMR became Nationally Accredited by the Joint Hospital Accreditation Commission (Joint Commission) making it one of only 3 free-standing, non-hospital based treatment programs in America to receive such an honor. The program is in-network with almost all Managed Care Insurance Companies. Company Slogan: We Understand

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emberhealth.jpeg
Ember Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/life-management-resources.jpeg
Life Management Resources
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ember Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Life Management Resources
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ember Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Management Resources in 2026.

Incident History — Ember Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ember Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Life Management Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Management Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emberhealth.jpeg
Ember Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/life-management-resources.jpeg
Life Management Resources
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Life Management Resources company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ember Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Life Management Resources company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ember Health company.

In the current year, Life Management Resources company and Ember Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Life Management Resources company nor Ember Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Life Management Resources company nor Ember Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Life Management Resources company nor Ember Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ember Health company nor Life Management Resources company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ember Health company nor Life Management Resources company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ember Health company employs more people globally than Life Management Resources company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ember Health nor Life Management Resources holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N