Comparison Overview

Emanuel Sourcing Group

VS

PaperTyger

Emanuel Sourcing Group

175 Washington Street, Suite C-21, Winchester, MA, US, 01890
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Emanuel Sourcing Group is a print management services company focused on helping organizations improve efficiencies and reduce the costs of purchasing their print--from catalogs and magazines to direct mail programs and marketing collateral. ESG's custom-designed proprietary database houses the equipment lists and historical pricing data of over 1,000 of the best printers in North America, allowing users to quickly identify the perfect printer for any given print project at any given time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PaperTyger

377 University Ave., Westwood, 02090, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

𝗣𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗧𝘆𝗴𝗲𝗿, a brand of Chase Corporation, is a leading manufacturer of 𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 that combine the strength of film with the printability of paper. Produced in the USA with a 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱, 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁-𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀, PaperTyger delivers reliability, cost efficiency, and environmental responsibility in one solution. Our products are engineered to resist 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀, 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲, making them ideal for applications where durability and performance matter most. From 𝗲𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝘀, 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗽𝘀, 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀, PaperTyger provides consistent quality that helps customers reduce waste, improve efficiency, and elevate their brand image. With over 60 years of innovation from 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, PaperTyger reflects a global commitment to creating 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵-𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹𝘀 trusted across industries. Whether you need strength, sustainability, or specialty performance, PaperTyger ensures your paper delivers more. 👉 Learn more: chasecorp.com/products/durable-papers 👉 Request a Consult: chasecorp.com/contact-us

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emanuel-sourcing-group.jpeg
Emanuel Sourcing Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paper-tyger.jpeg
PaperTyger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emanuel Sourcing Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PaperTyger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emanuel Sourcing Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PaperTyger in 2025.

Incident History — Emanuel Sourcing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emanuel Sourcing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PaperTyger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PaperTyger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emanuel-sourcing-group.jpeg
Emanuel Sourcing Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paper-tyger.jpeg
PaperTyger
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emanuel Sourcing Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PaperTyger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PaperTyger company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Emanuel Sourcing Group company.

In the current year, PaperTyger company and Emanuel Sourcing Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PaperTyger company nor Emanuel Sourcing Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PaperTyger company nor Emanuel Sourcing Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PaperTyger company nor Emanuel Sourcing Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group company nor PaperTyger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PaperTyger company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Emanuel Sourcing Group company.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emanuel Sourcing Group nor PaperTyger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N