Comparison Overview

Emailage

VS

Computacenter

Emailage

25 South Arizona Place, Chandler, 85225, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

Emailage, now LexisNexis® Risk Solutions, is a global leader in fraud prevention and risk management. Through key partnerships, proprietary data, and advanced machine-learning technology, Emailage provides multi-faceted predictive solutions with email at the core.  We’re outsmarting fraud together with our clients, and helping businesses around the world realize significant return on investment through improved detection of fraudulent transactions. To learn more, visit: https://risk.lexisnexis.com, @lexisnexisrisk on Twitter, or the company’s LinkedIn page. 

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Computacenter

Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technology infrastructure to deliver digital transformation, enabling people and their business. Computacenter plc is a public company quoted on the London Stock Exchange (CCC.L) and a member of the FTSE 250. Computacenter employs over 21,000 people worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,537
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emailage.jpeg
Emailage
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emailage
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computacenter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emailage in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.

Incident History — Emailage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emailage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emailage.jpeg
Emailage
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised GitHub Account
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: GitHub account compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party platform
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Mailbox Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Computacenter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Emailage company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Emailage company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Computacenter company.

In the current year, Computacenter company and Emailage company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computacenter company nor Emailage company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Emailage company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Computacenter company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Computacenter company nor Emailage company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emailage company nor Computacenter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Emailage company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Computacenter company.

Computacenter company employs more people globally than Emailage company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emailage nor Computacenter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N