Comparison Overview

EM Duggan

VS

Comas S.p.A.

EM Duggan

140 Will Drive, Canton, MA, 02021, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

E.M. Duggan is a fifth generation, family-owned business long respected for expertise in plumbing, BIM, design, fire protection, HVAC, plumbing, service, and special projects. With a bonding capacity of up to $850 million, we have the ability to secure projects of any size and scope. Backed by more than 133 years of experience and quality craftsmanship, we complete all of our jobs correctly, on time, and with pride. We firmly believe that our client relationships are as important as our mechanical services. At E.M. Duggan we don’t just build mechanical systems, we build lasting relationships.#ThisIsUs

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Comas S.p.A.

Via Cendon, 1, Silea, Veneto, 31057, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

COMAS is the world leading supplier of primary equipment and processing solutions for both Conventional Tobacco and New Generation Products (NGP), as well as an emerging player in cosmetics and food industries. COMAS' vision is to provide customers with the best primary solutions, first class equipment and "on time" project delivery, whilst maintaining a flexible approach. By developing the creativity of its employees thus maximising the ability to meet all customers' requirements, COMAS aims at being the first choice supplier and manufacturer of the most innovative, reliable and cost effective process machinery. Starting from 2018 Comas is part of Coesia, a group of innovation-based, industrial solutions companies, operating globally and headquartered in Bologna, Italy. As part of the group, together with G.D, SASIB, Molins and Cerulean, COMAS supplies the tobacco industry with a complete portfolio of solutions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 215
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/em-duggan.jpeg
EM Duggan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comas-s-p-a.jpeg
Comas S.p.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EM Duggan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comas S.p.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EM Duggan in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comas S.p.A. in 2025.

Incident History — EM Duggan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EM Duggan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comas S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comas S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/em-duggan.jpeg
EM Duggan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comas-s-p-a.jpeg
Comas S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Comas S.p.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EM Duggan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Comas S.p.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EM Duggan company.

In the current year, Comas S.p.A. company and EM Duggan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comas S.p.A. company nor EM Duggan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comas S.p.A. company nor EM Duggan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comas S.p.A. company nor EM Duggan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EM Duggan company nor Comas S.p.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Comas S.p.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EM Duggan company.

Comas S.p.A. company employs more people globally than EM Duggan company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EM Duggan nor Comas S.p.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H