Comparison Overview

ELTA North America

VS

CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific

ELTA North America

8955 Henkels Lane, Annapolis Junction, Maryland, 20701, US
Last Update: 2025-05-02 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

ELTA North America is a global leader in the design, manufacture and support of innovative electronic systems for the United States government. These proven high performance systems and a focus on customer satisfaction are the foundations of the company’s commitment to providing solutions to the nation’s warfighters, security personnel and first responders. The company provides solutions in the ground, maritime, airborne and security domains. ELTA North America is located in Annapolis Junction, MD. We are proudly partnered with ELTA Systems Ltd, Israel’s leading defense company and Center of Excellence for advanced radars and integrated solutions.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific

350 Parramatta Rd Homebush, New South Wales 2140, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

CAE is the leading global training and simulation company developing solutions that prepare defence forces for mission success. For over 30 years, CAE has had a significant presence in the Indo-Pacific region that today includes more than 300 employees at 20 sites. CAE resolves operational challenges by transforming training and mission operations across the maritime, land, and air domains, partnering with regional defence forces to accelerate the readiness of personnel.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elta-north-america.jpeg
ELTA North America
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cae-australia.jpeg
CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ELTA North America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELTA North America in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific in 2025.

Incident History — ELTA North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELTA North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CAE Defence & Security ‚Äì Indo-Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elta-north-america.jpeg
ELTA North America
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cae-australia.jpeg
CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to ELTA North America company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ELTA North America company.

In the current year, CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company and ELTA North America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company nor ELTA North America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company nor ELTA North America company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company nor ELTA North America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ELTA North America company nor CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ELTA North America company nor CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ELTA North America company employs more people globally than CAE Defence & Security – Indo-Pacific company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.