Comparison Overview

ELSIE MANAGEMENT

VS

The Looking Glass

ELSIE MANAGEMENT

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.elsieman.org

Now celebrating our twentieth year, Elsie Management represents a roster of performing artists for engagements to performing arts centers, venues of all shapes and sizes, festivals, and special event programming. We are dedicated to promoting exceptional, award-winning performing artists and companies with singular visions that scope the traditional and experimental gamut of the performing arts.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Looking Glass

901, Manav Heights, Matunga, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400014
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thelookingglass.co.in

The Looking Glass is an initiative towards integrating Arts and Education at the most natural, organic and humane level. Through Music, Dance, Theatre and Visual Arts, we endeavour to create an ambience that perpetuates the natural development of an individual, sensitising him/her, and ultimately helping the individual embark upon a journey to finding the Self.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsie-management.jpeg
ELSIE MANAGEMENT
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-looking-glass.jpeg
The Looking Glass
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ELSIE MANAGEMENT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Looking Glass
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELSIE MANAGEMENT in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Looking Glass in 2025.

Incident History — ELSIE MANAGEMENT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELSIE MANAGEMENT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Looking Glass (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Looking Glass cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsie-management.jpeg
ELSIE MANAGEMENT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-looking-glass.jpeg
The Looking Glass
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Looking Glass company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ELSIE MANAGEMENT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Looking Glass company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ELSIE MANAGEMENT company.

In the current year, The Looking Glass company and ELSIE MANAGEMENT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Looking Glass company nor ELSIE MANAGEMENT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Looking Glass company nor ELSIE MANAGEMENT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Looking Glass company nor ELSIE MANAGEMENT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT company nor The Looking Glass company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT company nor The Looking Glass company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Looking Glass company employs more people globally than ELSIE MANAGEMENT company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ELSIE MANAGEMENT nor The Looking Glass holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References