Comparison Overview

ELSAN

VS

LUX MED

ELSAN

58 bis, rue la Boétie Paris, France 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

ELSAN, groupe leader de l’hospitalisation privée en France, compte aujourd’hui plus de 28 000 collaborateurs et 7500 médecins libéraux qui exercent dans les 212 établissements et centres du groupe. Ils prennent en charge plus de 4,8 millions de patients par an. Notre mission : offrir à chacun des soins de qualité, innovants et humains. Notre raison d'être : Agir pour la santé de tous, au coeur des territoires.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LUX MED

Szturmowa 2 Warszawa, 02-678, PL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

LUX MED - leader and trustworthy expert We care for the health of the patients professionally and with engagement, we have been developing our business for over 20 years. Today we are the leader and expert on the private healthcare market. We take under our care both individual patients and corporate ones and their families. Out-patient activity is realized under two leading and complementary brands - LUX MED and Medycyna Rodzinna. We have an impressive network, which is created by over 1600 facilities with modern equipment throughout Poland, where we diagnose, examine and treat over 1 200 000 patients. We already have our own 114 medical centers, 1500 cooperating facilities and one of the biggest in Poland private diagnostic database. In 2010 we opened a hospital in Warsaw. We have over 8500 employees, including 4100 medical doctors of various specialties. Trust, satisfaction and health of the patients are values that we put great importance to. Meeting your expectations we are still perfecting our standards and implementing new solutions to provide constantly high quality of services, easy access to the doctors, consultations and examinations.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsan.jpeg
ELSAN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lux-med.jpeg
LUX MED
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ELSAN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LUX MED
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELSAN in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LUX MED in 2025.

Incident History — ELSAN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELSAN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LUX MED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LUX MED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsan.jpeg
ELSAN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lux-med.jpeg
LUX MED
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LUX MED company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ELSAN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LUX MED company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ELSAN company.

In the current year, LUX MED company and ELSAN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LUX MED company nor ELSAN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LUX MED company nor ELSAN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LUX MED company nor ELSAN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ELSAN company nor LUX MED company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ELSAN company nor LUX MED company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both ELSAN company and LUX MED company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ELSAN nor LUX MED holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H