Comparison Overview

English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley

VS

American Patriot Title

English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley

1101 College Street, Bowling Green, KY, 42101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley, LLP, the largest law firm in Southcentral Kentucky, offers business clients and individuals the experience and depth of a large firm and the personal commitment and attention of a small one. For 50 years, the firm has worked with clients to develop creative solutions to difficult legal and business problems.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Patriot Title

18540 North Dale Mabry Hwy, Lutz, FL, 33548, undefined
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Tampa Real Estate & Administrative Lawyer Experienced Attorney Practicing Real Estate Law in West Central Florida and Administrative Law Statewide For more than 20 years, attorney David Rankin has been helping residential and commercial real estate clients in the Tampa area navigate the process to a smooth and successful transaction. Additionally, for over 30 years, Mr. Rankin has represented countless licensed professionals throughout Florida statewide appear before their licensing board when called for proceedings. Whether your legal needs involve Tampa area real estate or Florida administrative law, David Rankin is an attorney you can trust to help you through. Contact experienced Tampa real estate & administrative lawyer David P. Rankin today.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elpolaw.jpeg
English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-patriot-title.jpeg
American Patriot Title
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Patriot Title
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Patriot Title in 2025.

Incident History — English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Patriot Title (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Patriot Title cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elpolaw.jpeg
English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-patriot-title.jpeg
American Patriot Title
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Patriot Title company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Patriot Title company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company.

In the current year, American Patriot Title company and English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Patriot Title company nor English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Patriot Title company nor English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Patriot Title company nor English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company nor American Patriot Title company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company nor American Patriot Title company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley company employs more people globally than American Patriot Title company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds HIPAA certification.

Neither English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley nor American Patriot Title holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X