Comparison Overview

eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company

VS

TrainSignal

eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company

14934 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida, 33613, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Ranked as the #1 LMS (out of over 700) by E-learning 24/7 in 2017 and the #1 Best All-Purpose Extended Enterpise LMS by Talented Learning in 2016, eLogic produces meaningful results for its client partners. Founded in 2001, eLogic Learning is an industry-leading provider of Learning Management Systems, custom content development and learning strategy solutions. Our cloud-based learning management technology, content capabilities and accompanying subject matter expertise provide every partner with a tailored approach to success.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TrainSignal

152 W. Center Court, Schaumburg, IL, 60195, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

TrainSignal is a leading provider of online IT training for Microsoft, VMware, Cisco, CompTIA, and Citrix. Gain access to our entire library for only $49/month! This includes access to all of our courses and practice exams, as well as our downloadable offline video player. Check us out with a FREE 3-Day trial. www.trainsignal.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elogic-learning.jpeg
eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trainsignal.jpeg
TrainSignal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TrainSignal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TrainSignal in 2025.

Incident History — eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TrainSignal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TrainSignal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elogic-learning.jpeg
eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trainsignal.jpeg
TrainSignal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company and TrainSignal company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, TrainSignal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company.

In the current year, TrainSignal company and eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TrainSignal company nor eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TrainSignal company nor eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TrainSignal company nor eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company nor TrainSignal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company nor TrainSignal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TrainSignal company employs more people globally than eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither eLogic Learning, an Absorb Software Company nor TrainSignal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X