Comparison Overview

Elmo Leather

VS

Circus 25

Elmo Leather

Kyrkogatan, Svenljunga, undefined, 51281, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.elmoleather.com

According to many, leather is the most versatile of all natural materials available. Since the founding of Elmo in 1931, the company has grown to become a leading manufacturer of exclusive leather to the furniture and automotive industries. Since the late 80’s we have been driving the tanning industry towards water based coatings, pioneering discharge water purification in our state of the art biological Water Treatment Plant and facilitating local farmers with high efficient fertilizers produced from by-products. We develop, produce, market and sell Elmo in about 40 markets worldwide, with over 95 % of our sales occurring outside Sweden. Elmo's head office is located in Svenljunga, Sweden, with production, product development and sales. Sales offices also located in Highpoint, NC, USA and in Hong Kong.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Circus 25

25 Connaught Street, London, W2 2ay, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trade.circus25.com

Circus 25 is a luxurious homeware brand supplying stunning interior décor and accessories to retail and trade customers. Via a team of industry experts, Circus 25 also provides interior design and curtain services. When you visit Circus 25 you are entering a world of imagination. It is a place of luxurious and quirky design that elevates living standards to new heights.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elmo-leather.jpeg
Elmo Leather
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circus-25.jpeg
Circus 25
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elmo Leather
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Circus 25
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elmo Leather in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circus 25 in 2025.

Incident History — Elmo Leather (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elmo Leather cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Circus 25 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circus 25 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elmo-leather.jpeg
Elmo Leather
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/circus-25.jpeg
Circus 25
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Elmo Leather company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Circus 25 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Circus 25 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elmo Leather company.

In the current year, Circus 25 company and Elmo Leather company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Circus 25 company nor Elmo Leather company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Circus 25 company nor Elmo Leather company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Circus 25 company nor Elmo Leather company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elmo Leather company nor Circus 25 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Elmo Leather company nor Circus 25 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Elmo Leather company employs more people globally than Circus 25 company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elmo Leather nor Circus 25 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References