Comparison Overview

ELMED d.o.o.

VS

Dublin Technical Systems, Inc

ELMED d.o.o.

JNA 166, Temerin, 21235, RS
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Since 1990, ELMED has been on the leading edge of product marking, labelling and traceability solutions. Our goal has always been to build successful and long-lasting partnerships with our customers, contributing to increased production efficiency, product traceability and brand protection. Supported by continuous growth in the market, in 2004 ELMED has expanded its range to include inspection systems, as well as our own production of self-adhesive labels, transport systems, stands and special engineering projects. Our team of 150 trained experts in sales, service, research and development, applied solutions and administration are continuously working on improving their own skills, and at the same time improving customer satisfaction.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dublin Technical Systems, Inc

6199 Shamrock Ct, Dublin, Ohio, 43016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since 1985, Dublin Technical Systems, Inc. has been providing top quality Instrumentation and Control System Engineering and Services at competitive rates. We have successfully completed nearly 4,000 projects for a wide variety of clients across the United States and overseas. We are a Tier 1 qualified vendor at several of the largest manufacturers in the Midwest and have a team of more than a dozen engineers and technical specialists in all stages engineering, CAD, instrumentation and control system project work, as well as material handling system and automated test-fixture design. We are a registered Systems Integrator for Wonderware, Intellution, Siemens as well as an Authorized System Integrator (ASI) for Square D/Modicon products. We also are a registered Solution Provider for GE Fanuc products including all PLC and HMI products - and for Rockwell Software and Allen-Bradley. We have extensive experience designing, programming, implementing and maintaining all leading brands of PLC-based control systems including, Allen Bradley, Mitsubishi, ABB, GE, OMRON, PILZ, and many others. We are also specialists at converting non-industry-standard and/or obsolete PLC systems to current leading brand-based systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elmed-d.o.o..jpeg
ELMED d.o.o.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dublin-technical-systems-inorporated.jpeg
Dublin Technical Systems, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ELMED d.o.o.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dublin Technical Systems, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELMED d.o.o. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dublin Technical Systems, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — ELMED d.o.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELMED d.o.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dublin Technical Systems, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dublin Technical Systems, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elmed-d.o.o..jpeg
ELMED d.o.o.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dublin-technical-systems-inorporated.jpeg
Dublin Technical Systems, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ELMED d.o.o. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ELMED d.o.o. company.

In the current year, Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company and ELMED d.o.o. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company nor ELMED d.o.o. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company nor ELMED d.o.o. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company nor ELMED d.o.o. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. company nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. company nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ELMED d.o.o. company employs more people globally than Dublin Technical Systems, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ELMED d.o.o. nor Dublin Technical Systems, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H