Comparison Overview

Elm Electrical, Inc.

VS

CPL Systems

Elm Electrical, Inc.

68 Union St., Westfield, Massachusetts, 01033, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.elmelec.com

Elm Electrical, Inc. is a diversified automation, construction, and electrical services provider that has been serving customers throughout the Northeast since 1971. Elm offers a broad portfolio of solutions from a single source, which includes: Automated Manufacturing and Distribution Systems. Design and Build Construction Services. Machinery and Mechanical Solutions. Control Panel Assembly Services. 24-7 Service and Support

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CPL Systems

1235 Eraste Landry Road, Lafayette, LA 70506, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cpl-systems.com

CPL Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 to satisfy customer demands for cost effective, single source solutions for industrial energy processes. "Dedicated to the Art of Performance" is our pledge to our customers. From its inception, CPL’s projects have always centered on the optimization of thermal process performance. From combustion performance to heat recovery, the art of optimizing performance equates to reduced energy requirements per unit of product. CPL’s services increase our customer’s sustainability by providing “green” solutions to their process energy needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elm-electrical-inc..jpeg
Elm Electrical, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpl-systems.jpeg
CPL Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elm Electrical, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CPL Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elm Electrical, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPL Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Elm Electrical, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elm Electrical, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CPL Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPL Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elm-electrical-inc..jpeg
Elm Electrical, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpl-systems.jpeg
CPL Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Elm Electrical, Inc. company and CPL Systems company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CPL Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elm Electrical, Inc. company.

In the current year, CPL Systems company and Elm Electrical, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CPL Systems company nor Elm Electrical, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CPL Systems company nor Elm Electrical, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CPL Systems company nor Elm Electrical, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. company nor CPL Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. company nor CPL Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Elm Electrical, Inc. company employs more people globally than CPL Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elm Electrical, Inc. nor CPL Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References