Comparison Overview

Elliptic

VS

Barclays

Elliptic

None, None, London, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Elliptic is the leader in digital asset decisioning. We have built the most comprehensive platform with unrivalled uptime and scalability for efficiently extracting crypto data and intelligence with the greatest accuracy. The depth and breadth of our data and intelligence means exacting organizations choose Elliptic for their compliance, risk management, intelligence operations and blockchain infrastructure needs.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Barclays

1 Churchill Place, London, GB, E14 5HP
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Barclays is a British universal bank. Our vision is to be the UK-centred leader in global finance. We are a diversified bank with comprehensive UK consumer, corporate and wealth and private banking franchises, a leading investment bank and a strong, specialist US consumer bank. Through these five divisions, we are working together for a better financial future for our customers, clients and communities. With over 325 years of history and expertise in banking, Barclays operates in over 40 countries and employs approximately 83,500 people. Barclays moves, lends, invests and protects money for customers and clients worldwide. Barclays is a trading name of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries. Barclays Bank PLC is registered in England and is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1026167. Registered office: 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 76,977
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellipticco.jpeg
Elliptic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elliptic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barclays
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elliptic in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays in 2025.

Incident History — Elliptic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elliptic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barclays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellipticco.jpeg
Elliptic
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Labor Trafficking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barclays company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elliptic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Elliptic company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Barclays company has not reported any.

In the current year, Barclays company and Elliptic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barclays company nor Elliptic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barclays company nor Elliptic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Elliptic company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Barclays company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Elliptic company nor Barclays company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barclays company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Elliptic company.

Barclays company employs more people globally than Elliptic company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elliptic nor Barclays holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N