Comparison Overview

Ellenhorn

VS

Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC

Ellenhorn

406 Massachusetts Ave, Arlington, 02474, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Ellenhorn is a private Program for Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) team, providing comprehensive multidisciplinary services, contoured to the individual needs of each of our clients. We offer a non-institutional alternative to hospital and residential programs, with proven results. Our team is comprised of psychiatrists, nurses, therapists, social workers and personal trainers. Follow us on Twitter @EllenhornPACT

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC

Greensboro, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Specializing in psychotherapy, I offer tailored counseling services to individuals within the diverse LGBTIQ2S community, addressing a range of mental health needs. With a focus on life coaching, I guide clients towards personal growth and empowerment, helping them navigate life's challenges with resilience and confidence. Additionally, my expertise extends to treating substance use disorders, providing effective strategies for managing and overcoming symptoms. In the realms of Behavioral Health and Medication Assisted Treatment, I offer comprehensive consultation services, ensuring that documentation is accurate and compliant with state and federal regulations. With a deep understanding of both regulatory and legal frameworks, including experience with CARF, DEA, and JACHO audits, I help organizations maintain high standards of care while meeting legal requirements.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellenhorn.jpeg
Ellenhorn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubicon-therapeutic-and-consultation-services-pllc.jpeg
Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ellenhorn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ellenhorn in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC in 2026.

Incident History — Ellenhorn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ellenhorn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellenhorn.jpeg
Ellenhorn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubicon-therapeutic-and-consultation-services-pllc.jpeg
Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ellenhorn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ellenhorn company.

In the current year, Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company and Ellenhorn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ellenhorn company nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ellenhorn company nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ellenhorn company employs more people globally than Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor Rubicon Therapeutic and Consultation Services, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H