Comparison Overview

Ellenhorn

VS

NeuroStim TMS Centers

Ellenhorn

406 Massachusetts Ave, Arlington, 02474, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ellenhorn.com

Ellenhorn is a private Program for Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) team, providing comprehensive multidisciplinary services, contoured to the individual needs of each of our clients. We offer a non-institutional alternative to hospital and residential programs, with proven results. Our team is comprised of psychiatrists, nurses, therapists, social workers and personal trainers. Follow us on Twitter @EllenhornPACT

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NeuroStim TMS Centers

10700 Meridian Ave N, Seattle, 98133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://neurostimtms.com

NeuroStim TMS is Washington's largest provider of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS Therapy) with sixteen (16) TMS treatment centers located throughout Washington, Arizona, and Minnesota. Since inception, we have provided over 250,000 TMS patient treatments. Our independent, state-of-the-art TMS Centers are dedicated to offering all mental health professionals, referring medical doctors and their patients one of the most advanced options for treating Major Depressive Disorder, Postpartum Depression, anxiety disorders including OCD, PTSD, General Anxiety Disorder and other mood disorders. We are the proud Pioneers of the One-Day TMS™ protocol, a scientifically validated, patient-centered approach designed to accelerate healing from depression, anxiety, and other mood disorders. Under the supervision of our Medical Directors, our TMS Specialists provide a safe, non-invasive and effective outpatient procedure that has helped thousands of patients who have not responded well to drug therapy.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellenhorn.jpeg
Ellenhorn
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neurostimtmscenters.jpeg
NeuroStim TMS Centers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ellenhorn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NeuroStim TMS Centers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ellenhorn in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NeuroStim TMS Centers in 2026.

Incident History — Ellenhorn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ellenhorn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NeuroStim TMS Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NeuroStim TMS Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ellenhorn.jpeg
Ellenhorn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neurostimtmscenters.jpeg
NeuroStim TMS Centers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ellenhorn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NeuroStim TMS Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NeuroStim TMS Centers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ellenhorn company.

In the current year, NeuroStim TMS Centers company and Ellenhorn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NeuroStim TMS Centers company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NeuroStim TMS Centers company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NeuroStim TMS Centers company nor Ellenhorn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ellenhorn company nor NeuroStim TMS Centers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ellenhorn company nor NeuroStim TMS Centers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ellenhorn company employs more people globally than NeuroStim TMS Centers company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ellenhorn nor NeuroStim TMS Centers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References