Comparison Overview

Ella Sharp Museum

VS

Natural History Museum

Ella Sharp Museum

3225 4th St, Jackson, Michigan, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ellasharpmuseum.org

The Ella Sharp Museum opened on October 3, 1965. The Museum meets the challenge of bringing the visual arts and the area's history to visitors through exhibits, community festivals and outreach programs. At "The Ella"​, visitors have a full menu of great things to choose from: -Six galleries of art and history including the Andrews Gallery of Wildlife Art, the Jackson History Gallery, and three galleries featuring traveling and "​in house"​ exhibitions. -Ella Sharp's 19th century Hillside Farmhouse and Merriman-Sharp Interpretive Center. -Other historic structures and exhibits including the Dibble One-Room Schoolhouse, Eli Stilson Log House, and Merriman-Sharp Tower Barn. -The state of the art Hurst Planetarium that offers weekly planetarium shows, educational programming and works as a location for your special event -A full slate of educational and entertaining programming including lectures, school out-reach, field trips, tours, gallery walks, community free events, and the popular Art & Wine Festival. -A 3,000-square-foot Grand Community Room with adjacent patio and park view, catering kitchen, and stage to accommodate a variety of gatherings.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Natural History Museum

Cromwell Road, London, England, SW7 5BD, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nhm.ac.uk

The Natural History Museum is a world-class visitor attraction and leading science research centre. We use the Museum's unique collections and our unrivalled expertise to tackle the biggest challenges facing the world today. More than 80 million objects spanning billions of years are in our care. We welcome more than five million visitors to our galleries annually, and 16 million visitors to our websites. Today the Museum is more relevant and influential than ever. By attracting people from a range of backgrounds to work for us, we can continue to look at the world with fresh eyes. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jobs  Stay up to date with Museum news and events on our website: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/ And on social media: https://facebook.com/naturalhistorymuseum  https://twitter.com/NHM_London https://instagram/natural_history_museum  https://www.tiktok.com/@its_nhm https://youtube.com/naturalhistorymuseum

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,656
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ella-sharp-museum.jpeg
Ella Sharp Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ella Sharp Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natural History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ella Sharp Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Ella Sharp Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ella Sharp Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natural History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ella-sharp-museum.jpeg
Ella Sharp Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natural History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ella Sharp Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natural History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ella Sharp Museum company.

In the current year, Natural History Museum company and Ella Sharp Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Ella Sharp Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Ella Sharp Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Ella Sharp Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum company nor Natural History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Natural History Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ella Sharp Museum company.

Natural History Museum company employs more people globally than Ella Sharp Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ella Sharp Museum nor Natural History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References