Comparison Overview

Elk River, Inc

VS

Consolidated Contractors Company

Elk River, Inc

1202 26th Street SW, Cullman, AL, 35056, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Elk River Inc. manufactures performance-designed fall protection products for the professionally trained worker.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Consolidated Contractors Company

Leoforos Kifisias 60, Marousi 15125, Athens, undefined, undefined, GR
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Consolidated Contractors International company is a leading diversified company carrying out construction, engineering, procurement, development and investment activities internationally. We are committed to providing reliable, amicable, and professional service to our valuable clients, and to being supportive to local businesses and social activities, being friendly to the environment as well as being proactive in the socio-economic environments within which we operate. Our appreciation of our clients'โ€‹ interests, evidenced by meeting their requirements and ensuring high quality work, is the prime directive of our management. Our growth and profitability are maintained through innovation, technical enhancement, and adaptability to all our markets. Our profitability is directed towards sustaining growth and to providing satisfactory returns to our shareholders. Our commitment to growth is firmly linked to our commitment to our employees'โ€‹ continuous development and rewarding careers. We are also devoted to our employee's safety and health, job security, and welfare. Our strength emanates from our distinct culture, strong and close relationships with our clients, employees'โ€‹ competence and loyalty, entrepreneurial and flexible management, capability, dynamism, focus on quality and safety, and commercial acumen.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 14,458
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elk-river-inc-.jpeg
Elk River, Inc
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-contractors-international-company.jpeg
Consolidated Contractors Company
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Elk River, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Consolidated Contractors Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elk River, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consolidated Contractors Company in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Elk River, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elk River, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Consolidated Contractors Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consolidated Contractors Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elk-river-inc-.jpeg
Elk River, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-contractors-international-company.jpeg
Consolidated Contractors Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Elk River, Inc company and Consolidated Contractors Company company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Consolidated Contractors Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elk River, Inc company.

In the current year, Consolidated Contractors Company company and Elk River, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Consolidated Contractors Company company nor Elk River, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Consolidated Contractors Company company nor Elk River, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Consolidated Contractors Company company nor Elk River, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elk River, Inc company nor Consolidated Contractors Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elk River, Inc company nor Consolidated Contractors Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Consolidated Contractors Company company employs more people globally than Elk River, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Allstar is a GitHub App to set and enforce security policies. In versions prior to 4.5, a vulnerability in Allstarโ€™s Reviewbot component caused inbound webhook requests to be validated against a hard-coded, shared secret. The value used for the secret token was compiled into the Allstar binary and could not be configured at runtime. In practice, this meant that every deployment using Reviewbot would validate requests with the same secret unless the operator modified source code and rebuilt the component - an expectation that is not documented and is easy to miss. All Allstar releases prior to v4.5 that include the Reviewbot code path are affected. Deployments on v4.5 and later are not affected. Those who have not enabled or exposed the Reviewbot endpoint are not exposed to this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities with Calendar events in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a userโ€™s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name or (3) Last Name text field.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. In versions prior to 5.6.0, upon authentication, the user could be associated by e-mail even if the `associate_by_email` pipeline was not included. This could lead to account compromise when a third-party authentication service does not validate provided e-mail addresses or doesn't require unique e-mail addresses. Version 5.6.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, review the authentication service policy on e-mail addresses; many will not allow exploiting this vulnerability.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X