Comparison Overview

Elizabeth Taylor Graphics

VS

Gway Printing and Graphics

Elizabeth Taylor Graphics

undefined, undefined, undefined, 5032, NZ
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.etgraphics.co.nz

Elizabeth Taylor Graphics is an innovative printing company with a unique print ordering system within New Zealand. It provides for overnight delivery of quality 4 colour laser printing. Banners to vehicle graphics, business cards to roll up banners, Elizabeth Taylor Graphics can help your business with marketing and cost effective promotion.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gway Printing and Graphics

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gwayonline.com

Since 1995 we have worked with clients ranging from small startups to Fortune 500 companies supplying the highest quality printed material. We are unique in that we do a lot more than the traditional print shop. Of course we offer offset printing, digital printing, large format printing, bindery services, and mailing/fulfillment, but we also custom manufacturer point of sale materials, trade show graphics and displays, billboard graphics, building wraps, vehicle graphics, and just about anything else that can be printed. There is very little we can't do and haven't done. From our large plant in New England we ship all over the world to clients as far away as Australia and New Zealand. Usually all this knowledge and access to this level of resources with a domestically based company comes at a steep price. But we aggressively seek out cost cutting techniques and volume purchasing of materials to keep our prices competitive, quality high, and delivery times short. We also support our customers by giving them access to the knowledge we have achieved over the years so they get their projects started right and avoid the pitfalls many learn by trial and error.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elizabeth-taylor-graphics.jpeg
Elizabeth Taylor Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gway-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
Gway Printing and Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elizabeth Taylor Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gway Printing and Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elizabeth Taylor Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gway Printing and Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Elizabeth Taylor Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elizabeth Taylor Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gway Printing and Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gway Printing and Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elizabeth-taylor-graphics.jpeg
Elizabeth Taylor Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gway-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
Gway Printing and Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company and Gway Printing and Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gway Printing and Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company.

In the current year, Gway Printing and Graphics company and Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gway Printing and Graphics company nor Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gway Printing and Graphics company nor Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gway Printing and Graphics company nor Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company nor Gway Printing and Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company nor Gway Printing and Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gway Printing and Graphics company employs more people globally than Elizabeth Taylor Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elizabeth Taylor Graphics nor Gway Printing and Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References