Comparison Overview

Elite Casino Resorts

VS

Abuan Gaming LLC

Elite Casino Resorts

3184 HWY 22, None, Riverside, Iowa, US, 52327
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Elite Casino Resorts currently owns and operates three premier gaming and resort destinations in Iowa. ELITE Sportsbook™ is Iowa's only locally owned sports book. Riverside Casino and Golf Resort® & ELITE Sportsbook™ in Riverside, Iowa, located just minutes from Iowa City, IA. Grand Falls Casino & Golf Resort® located in Larchwood, IA. Rhythm City Casino Resort® & ELITE Sportsbook™ located in the Quad Cities in Davenport, IA. ELITE Sportsbook™ is also available in Colorado. Grand Island Casino Resort™ is COMING SOON to Nebraska! Customer service is at the core of what we do. We put customers first with friendly staff to help at every turn. Our facilities feature modern yet comfortable décor and the very best in amenities including spas, first-class golf courses, fine dining, casual dining and shopping. Our restaurants are second to none. You will find something for everyone, whether it is our quick serve outlets, all you can eat Robert's Buffet, the best in fine dining at Ruthie's Steak & Seafood, or classic favorites in Draft Day Sports Lounge®. Elite Casino Resort locations offer the best in weekly live entertainment in our show lounges as well as some of the best headliner acts in the Midwest.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Abuan Gaming LLC

undefined, Las Vegas, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Abuan Gaming is a family-owned and operated company. Starting as early as 2005, Ray Abuan developed Lucky 9 table game. Abuan Gaming is currently, but not limited to, developing, leasing, and licensing internally-developed proprietary games, gaming procedures & methods. Lucky 9, our first proprietary game, will be entering field trial on March 23rd, and will be in field trial for 45 days. General release is expected soon after and no later than December 2011.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elitecasinoresorts.jpeg
Elite Casino Resorts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abuan-gaming-llc.jpeg
Abuan Gaming LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elite Casino Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Abuan Gaming LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elite Casino Resorts in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abuan Gaming LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Elite Casino Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elite Casino Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Abuan Gaming LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abuan Gaming LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elitecasinoresorts.jpeg
Elite Casino Resorts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abuan-gaming-llc.jpeg
Abuan Gaming LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Abuan Gaming LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elite Casino Resorts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Abuan Gaming LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elite Casino Resorts company.

In the current year, Abuan Gaming LLC company and Elite Casino Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Abuan Gaming LLC company nor Elite Casino Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Abuan Gaming LLC company nor Elite Casino Resorts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Abuan Gaming LLC company nor Elite Casino Resorts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts company nor Abuan Gaming LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts company nor Abuan Gaming LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Elite Casino Resorts company employs more people globally than Abuan Gaming LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elite Casino Resorts nor Abuan Gaming LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H