Comparison Overview

Elite Hotels, Inc

VS

Kerzner International

Elite Hotels, Inc

undefined, undefined, undefined, 06820, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

United States representation of small, boutique hotels. Handle all aspects of sales, marketing, public relations, advertising and reservations.

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kerzner International

undefined, Dubai, undefined, undefined, AE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849

Kerzner International has built a diverse collection of iconic brands and luxury properties, earning international acclaim for pioneering destination-defining hospitality, delivering unrivalled service, and curating transformative guest experiences. We are renowned for creating hospitality brands that are distinct and disruptive. Through Atlantis, One&Only, SIRO, and Rare Finds, our portfolio provides unforgettable and immersive experiences for guests in search of extraordinary moments. From authentic cultural exploration to innovative luxury concepts, every brand we build challenges convention to create unique journeys of discovery. We are a company that never settles. Because of this, we attract colleagues who share our desire to push until the next level is achieved, and then to keep going. We invest in our colleagues and our communities by working proactively to create jobs, training, education and opportunities that enrich lives. Our colleagues are at the heart of who we are and what we do. International resorts go hand in hand with an international team. In fact, we have more than 16,000 colleagues representing over 120 nationalities. And although we come from all over the world, we are united by the drive to create amazing experiences and everlasting memories for all.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 15,154
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Elite Hotels, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerzner-international.jpeg
Kerzner International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elite Hotels, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kerzner International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elite Hotels, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kerzner International in 2025.

Incident History — Elite Hotels, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elite Hotels, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kerzner International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kerzner International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Elite Hotels, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerzner-international.jpeg
Kerzner International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kerzner International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elite Hotels, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kerzner International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elite Hotels, Inc company.

In the current year, Kerzner International company and Elite Hotels, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kerzner International company nor Elite Hotels, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kerzner International company nor Elite Hotels, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kerzner International company nor Elite Hotels, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc company nor Kerzner International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kerzner International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Elite Hotels, Inc company.

Kerzner International company employs more people globally than Elite Hotels, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elite Hotels, Inc nor Kerzner International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2 lacks a verified secure-boot chain and runtime integrity validation for its controller and display modules. Without cryptographic boot verification, an attacker with physical access can modify or replace the bootloader, kernel, or filesystem and gain persistent code execution on reboot. This weakness allows long-term firmware tampering that survives power cycles. The vendor indicates that more recent firmware updates strengthen update-chain integrity and disable physical update ports to mitigate related attack avenues.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS bc-fips on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java LTS bcprov-lts8on on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCMSIV.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA224NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA3NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHAKENativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA512NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA384NativeDigest.Java. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS: from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1; Bouncy Castle for Java LTS: from 2.73.0 through 2.73.7.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. In versions from 38.0.0 to before 38.0.3, the implementation of component-model related host-to-wasm trampolines in Wasmtime contained a bug where it's possible to carefully craft a component, which when called in a specific way, would crash the host with a segfault or assert failure. Wasmtime 38.0.3 has been released and is patched to fix this issue. There are no workarounds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X