Comparison Overview

Elite Signs and Graphics

VS

Priority Graphics

Elite Signs and Graphics

2550 s Decker Lake Blvd, West Valley City, Utah, 84119, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://801signs.com

Elite Signs and Graphics will help you achieve your advertising and branding goals using our high-quality custom print technology. We aim to enhance our customers’ businesses with our integrated sign and graphic solutions, premier service, and exceptional products. We have the expertise to handle almost any job, no matter how big or small. Whether you’re looking for t-shirts for the annual family reunion, jerseys for your softball team, clothing for fund raisers for school, or polo’s for a corporate event, we’ve got you covered from the design to the printing. No job is too small!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Priority Graphics

4026 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, In, 46222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://prioritygraphics.co

At Priority Graphics we're creating visual brand experiences for our clients. Priority does this by designing, managing, producing, and installing visual graphics for events, exhibits, environments, retail, fleets and facades. Understanding the need for holistic brand immersion, Priority is insanely creative while being supported by an extensive and robust manufacturing capability. With Priority, the creative boundaries are limitless, as are the size limitations related to the brand elements. Whether a multi-story building wrap, interactive exhibit, POP display or customized product packaging, Priority has the experience and the technology to deliver the optimal brand experience. Products that Priority Graphics produces include: signage, banners, window clings, floor graphics, wall graphics, billboards, building wraps, custom packaging, posters, vehicle graphics, and POP displays amongst others.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elite-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Elite Signs and Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/priority-graphics-in-indianapolis.jpeg
Priority Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elite Signs and Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Priority Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elite Signs and Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Priority Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Elite Signs and Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elite Signs and Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Priority Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Priority Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elite-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Elite Signs and Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/priority-graphics-in-indianapolis.jpeg
Priority Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Elite Signs and Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Priority Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Priority Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elite Signs and Graphics company.

In the current year, Priority Graphics company and Elite Signs and Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Priority Graphics company nor Elite Signs and Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Priority Graphics company nor Elite Signs and Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Priority Graphics company nor Elite Signs and Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics company nor Priority Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Priority Graphics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Elite Signs and Graphics company.

Elite Signs and Graphics company employs more people globally than Priority Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elite Signs and Graphics nor Priority Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References