Comparison Overview

Elimitix Traffic Law Firm

VS

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter

Elimitix Traffic Law Firm

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

ElimiTix Traffic Law Firm is dedicated to providing convenient, affordable and quality legal representation for anyone who is charged or cited with Traffic offense. We specialize in traffic tickets and we are proud of our technology that allows users to upload their ticket by simply taking a picture and submitting through their mobile phones or computers. Our users never need to appear in court on civil infractions and our services cost as low $99.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter

3450 Acworth Due West Rd NW, Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The personal injury trial attorneys at Williams Elleby Howard & Easter are based out of Cobb County, Georgia. They litigate serious cases involving car accidents, tractor-trailer wrecks and premises liability injuries throughout the state of Georgia. Joel Williams created this firm to help individuals facing serious personal injuries or death due to the fault of someone else and he only takes cases where he believes that the injured person is entitled to compensation. The firm has successfully tried cases in big cities like Atlanta and Savannah. We are also experienced litigators for small towns throughout the State of Georgia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elimitix-traffic-law-firm.jpeg
Elimitix Traffic Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamselleby.jpeg
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elimitix Traffic Law Firm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elimitix Traffic Law Firm in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams Elleby Howard & Easter in 2025.

Incident History — Elimitix Traffic Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elimitix Traffic Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Williams Elleby Howard & Easter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elimitix-traffic-law-firm.jpeg
Elimitix Traffic Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamselleby.jpeg
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company.

In the current year, Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company and Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company nor Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company nor Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company nor Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company employs more people globally than Elimitix Traffic Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elimitix Traffic Law Firm nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X