Comparison Overview

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.

VS

XIC - Design | Print | Display

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.

20 Forge Street, Keene, New Hampshire, 03431, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Need labels for nasty surfaces? How about a print company that can provide labels, barcodes, printers, software AND scanners? Responses that you don't have to wait days for? Hi there, we're the Label Experts! Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. is a complete solution provider for barcode labels and complex prints since 1987. We've provided our services to countless industries across the globe with specific labeling requirements, including manufacturing, laboratory, warehousing, education, library, hospitals, food, stadiums, government, zoos...okay, you get the point. We house an extraordinary range of tested and true materials that cater to every unique labeling scenario that we've encountered over the years. From vinyl to polyimide, we're confident we have a label that you can count on.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

XIC - Design | Print | Display

Graphix House, Aberdeen, undefined, AB12 3JG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

THREE DECADES. THREE CORE SERVICES. ONE CREATIVE GOAL. Helping you maximise your marketing budget with high impact materials that get results, from reliably printing your business basics to delivering great graphics for your next big campaign. DESIGN | Meeting expectations is our bare minimum. PRINT | On time, to spec and with spot-on service. DISPLAY | Getting your message out there. SOCIAL DISTANCING MATERIALS | Keep staff, customers + visitors safe. SQUAD SNOODS | Whether you know it as a snood, neck tube or face scarf, your protective SQUAD snood will be one of the best little accessories you own. PRINTED SAFETY MATERIALS | Reduce risk + promote best practice. PROMOTIONAL GIFTS | Make sure your clients remember you. #thecreativeprinter | [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronicimagingmaterials.jpeg
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xic.jpeg
XIC - Design | Print | Display
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
XIC - Design | Print | Display
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XIC - Design | Print | Display in 2025.

Incident History — Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — XIC - Design | Print | Display (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XIC - Design | Print | Display cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronicimagingmaterials.jpeg
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xic.jpeg
XIC - Design | Print | Display
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to XIC - Design | Print | Display company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, XIC - Design | Print | Display company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company.

In the current year, XIC - Design | Print | Display company and Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither XIC - Design | Print | Display company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither XIC - Design | Print | Display company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither XIC - Design | Print | Display company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company nor XIC - Design | Print | Display company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company nor XIC - Design | Print | Display company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company employs more people globally than XIC - Design | Print | Display company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor XIC - Design | Print | Display holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N