Comparison Overview

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.

VS

Integ

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.

20 Forge Street, Keene, New Hampshire, 03431, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.barcode-labels.com

Need labels for nasty surfaces? How about a print company that can provide labels, barcodes, printers, software AND scanners? Responses that you don't have to wait days for? Hi there, we're the Label Experts! Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. is a complete solution provider for barcode labels and complex prints since 1987. We've provided our services to countless industries across the globe with specific labeling requirements, including manufacturing, laboratory, warehousing, education, library, hospitals, food, stadiums, government, zoos...okay, you get the point. We house an extraordinary range of tested and true materials that cater to every unique labeling scenario that we've encountered over the years. From vinyl to polyimide, we're confident we have a label that you can count on.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Integ

700 W Loop 340, Waco, Texas, 76712, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.integdoes.com

We are a client-driven company that handles the project needs of our customers, step-by-step from concept to execution, with sharp attention to their specific wishes, requirements, and vision. Integ is a solution provider for services including digital printing, offset printing, mailing and fulfillment, creative services, promotional products, signage and online portals. Every service we provide, from creative to mailing and everything in between, is integrated into each other so we can go one step at a time to be able to present you with exactly what you need. Integrity and Integration are what make Integ. Integ Does content delivery in a variety of ways to help tell your story. You have a story to tell...Integ Delivers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronicimagingmaterials.jpeg
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integdoes.jpeg
Integ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Integ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integ in 2025.

Incident History — Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Integ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronicimagingmaterials.jpeg
Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integdoes.jpeg
Integ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company and Integ company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Integ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company.

In the current year, Integ company and Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Integ company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Integ company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Integ company nor Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company nor Integ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company nor Integ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Integ company employs more people globally than Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Electronic Imaging Materials, Inc. nor Integ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References