Comparison Overview

Electronic Frontiers Australia

VS

The Justice Management Institute

Electronic Frontiers Australia

GPO Box 1235, Canberra, 2601, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://efa.org.au

Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (EFA) is a non-profit national organisation representing Internet users concerned with on-line freedoms and rights. EFA was established in January 1994 and incorporated under the Associations Incorporation Act (S.A.) in May 1994. EFA is independent of government and commerce and is funded by membership subscriptions and donations from individuals and organisations with an altruistic interest in promoting online civil liberties. Our major objectives are to protect and promote the civil liberties of users and operators of computer based communications systems such as the Internet, to advocate the amendment of laws and regulations in Australia and elsewhere (both current and proposed) which restrict free speech and to educate the community at large about the social, political, and civil liberties issues involved in the use of computer based communications systems.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Justice Management Institute

3033 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 22201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.jmijustice.org

During its 20 year history, JMI has conducted more than 300 projects designed to improve the administration of justice, nationally and internationally. JMI is guided by three principles—Think, Inspire, Change—that represent a holistic approach to change management and overall justice system improvement. JMI thinks about emerging and pressing issues by conducting original research and evaluation designed to both understand the nature of the problems facing justice systems and practitioners as well as to test the effectiveness of various approaches to responding to these issues. JMI inspires criminal justice practitioners and policymakers through our education and training programs. Finally, JMI helps bring change to the administration of justice by providing on-site specialized services to help local justice systems and individual stakeholders within the systems to design and implement different approaches to improve their overall effectiveness.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-frontiers-australia.jpeg
Electronic Frontiers Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-justice-management-institute.jpeg
The Justice Management Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Electronic Frontiers Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Justice Management Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Frontiers Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Justice Management Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Electronic Frontiers Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Frontiers Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Justice Management Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Justice Management Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-frontiers-australia.jpeg
Electronic Frontiers Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-justice-management-institute.jpeg
The Justice Management Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Justice Management Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Electronic Frontiers Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Justice Management Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Electronic Frontiers Australia company.

In the current year, The Justice Management Institute company and Electronic Frontiers Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Justice Management Institute company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Justice Management Institute company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Justice Management Institute company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia company nor The Justice Management Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia company nor The Justice Management Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Justice Management Institute company employs more people globally than Electronic Frontiers Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor The Justice Management Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References