Comparison Overview

Electronic Frontiers Australia

VS

Public Health Madison and Dane County

Electronic Frontiers Australia

GPO Box 1235, Canberra, 2601, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (EFA) is a non-profit national organisation representing Internet users concerned with on-line freedoms and rights. EFA was established in January 1994 and incorporated under the Associations Incorporation Act (S.A.) in May 1994. EFA is independent of government and commerce and is funded by membership subscriptions and donations from individuals and organisations with an altruistic interest in promoting online civil liberties. Our major objectives are to protect and promote the civil liberties of users and operators of computer based communications systems such as the Internet, to advocate the amendment of laws and regulations in Australia and elsewhere (both current and proposed) which restrict free speech and to educate the community at large about the social, political, and civil liberties issues involved in the use of computer based communications systems.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public Health Madison and Dane County

210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. , Room 507, Madison, WI, US, 53703
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Public Health Madison and Dane County’s (PHMDC) vision is “Healthy People. Healthy Places.” and its mission is to “Work with the community to enhance, protect, and promote the health of the environment and the well being of all people.” PHMDC fulfills its mission through its work on environmental health, community health, operations, health equity, and policy. PHMDC is increasing its focus on working with the community to address the root causes of disease and illness by focusing on policy, systems, and environmental changes.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-frontiers-australia.jpeg
Electronic Frontiers Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-health-madison-and-dane-county.jpeg
Public Health Madison and Dane County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Electronic Frontiers Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Health Madison and Dane County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Frontiers Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Health Madison and Dane County in 2025.

Incident History — Electronic Frontiers Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Frontiers Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Health Madison and Dane County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Health Madison and Dane County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-frontiers-australia.jpeg
Electronic Frontiers Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-health-madison-and-dane-county.jpeg
Public Health Madison and Dane County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public Health Madison and Dane County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Electronic Frontiers Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Health Madison and Dane County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Electronic Frontiers Australia company.

In the current year, Public Health Madison and Dane County company and Electronic Frontiers Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Health Madison and Dane County company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Health Madison and Dane County company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Health Madison and Dane County company nor Electronic Frontiers Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia company nor Public Health Madison and Dane County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia company nor Public Health Madison and Dane County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public Health Madison and Dane County company employs more people globally than Electronic Frontiers Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Electronic Frontiers Australia nor Public Health Madison and Dane County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H