Comparison Overview

elanDc

VS

Graffix Inc

elanDc

Adliya, Manama, undefined, undefined, BH
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

elanDc is one of the fastest growing advertising agency in the region. Why is elanDc different... simply on the principle that clients deserve the best. So we built a company committed to not just promise, but deliver something different; a company that believes, and exists to serve clients, build brands, and grow businesses.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graffix Inc

1312 S. 96th St., Seattle, WA, 98134, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Graffix is a world-class source for design, production, and fulfillment of environmental graphics. We seamlessly manufacture, fulfill, and install complete front and back of house signage and environments, including signage, wayfinding, wall graphics, and decor, communication systems & menus, fixtures, and any identity elements for each space. Our comprehensive project management capabilities ensure a build that doesn't compromise design and is on time and budget. We have brought this dedication to our clients for over 30 years, and we would appreciate the opportunity to show you how our commitment to your vision will benefit your new project. Our commitment is about connection, passion, inspiration, persistence, and relationships. We are tenacious about meeting your expectations and ensuring that we meet your vision in its entirety.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elandc.jpeg
elanDc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffix---portland.jpeg
Graffix Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
elanDc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graffix Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for elanDc in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graffix Inc in 2025.

Incident History — elanDc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

elanDc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graffix Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graffix Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elandc.jpeg
elanDc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffix---portland.jpeg
Graffix Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

elanDc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graffix Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Graffix Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to elanDc company.

In the current year, Graffix Inc company and elanDc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graffix Inc company nor elanDc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graffix Inc company nor elanDc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graffix Inc company nor elanDc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither elanDc company nor Graffix Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither elanDc company nor Graffix Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graffix Inc company employs more people globally than elanDc company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither elanDc nor Graffix Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X