Comparison Overview

EJ Victor

VS

Wurk SPACE

EJ Victor

110 Wamsutta Mill Rd, Morganton, North Carolina, 28655, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ejvictor.com

EJ Victor, recognized industry-wide for its exquisite quality, service, and value, is a locally owned, high-end furniture company located in North Carolina’s famous furniture heartland. Priding itself on the craftsmanship of devoted employees with know-how and commitment to building superior furniture, our company culture offers its customers easy access to responsible professionals who possess the information and answers that are needed. For more than thirty years, EJ Victor has built upon its own brand while also becoming a best-in-class licensing partner to premier global lifestyle brands.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wurk SPACE

Columbia, us
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wurkspace.net

Wurk Space is a full service office furniture dealer offering space plan and design services, project management, installation and reconfiguration services and products to meet any need and any budget. We offer modular and systems furniture, free standing desk suites, seating, filing, reception and lobby furniture, conference and training, Healthcare and more. We also offer remanufactured and LEED certified products. "We listen, evaluate and provide you with the right solution to support you, your employees, technologies and your company objectives. We pride ourselves in our flexibility to react to individual needs whether it be budget, time constraints or both." We service primarily the Baltimore/Washington area and support our clients in their ventures in cities across the United States.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ej-victor.jpeg
EJ Victor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wurkspace.jpeg
Wurk SPACE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EJ Victor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wurk SPACE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EJ Victor in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wurk SPACE in 2025.

Incident History — EJ Victor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EJ Victor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wurk SPACE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wurk SPACE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ej-victor.jpeg
EJ Victor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wurkspace.jpeg
Wurk SPACE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wurk SPACE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EJ Victor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wurk SPACE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EJ Victor company.

In the current year, Wurk SPACE company and EJ Victor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wurk SPACE company nor EJ Victor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wurk SPACE company nor EJ Victor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wurk SPACE company nor EJ Victor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EJ Victor company nor Wurk SPACE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EJ Victor company nor Wurk SPACE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EJ Victor company employs more people globally than Wurk SPACE company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EJ Victor nor Wurk SPACE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References