Comparison Overview

Einstein Healthcare Network

VS

UNC Health

Einstein Healthcare Network

5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, 19141, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 700 and 749

Jefferson Health - Einstein serves the greater Philadelphia area, including Montgomery County. http://www.einstein.edu

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,896
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

UNC Health

101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US, 27516
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of North Carolinians and others whom we serve. We accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education and research. UNC Health and its 40,000 teammates, continue to serve as North Carolina’s Health Care System, caring for patients from all 100 counties and beyond our borders. We continue to leverage the world class research conducted in the UNC School of Medicine, translating that innovation to life-saving and life-changing therapies, procedures, and techniques for the patients who rely on us. General terms of service for UNC Health social media: https://www.facebook.com/unchealthcare/about_details

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,399
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/einstein-healthcare-network.jpeg
Einstein Healthcare Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Einstein Healthcare Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UNC Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Einstein Healthcare Network in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNC Health in 2026.

Incident History — Einstein Healthcare Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Einstein Healthcare Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UNC Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNC Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/einstein-healthcare-network.jpeg
Einstein Healthcare Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UNC Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Einstein Healthcare Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Einstein Healthcare Network company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to UNC Health company.

In the current year, UNC Health company and Einstein Healthcare Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UNC Health company nor Einstein Healthcare Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both UNC Health company and Einstein Healthcare Network company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Einstein Healthcare Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UNC Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network company nor UNC Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UNC Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Einstein Healthcare Network company.

UNC Health company employs more people globally than Einstein Healthcare Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Einstein Healthcare Network nor UNC Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H