EHR.Network Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (EHRJUP1769139018)
The Rankiteo video explains how the company EHR.Network has been impacted by a Breach on the date January 22, 2024.
Incident Summary
If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.
Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis
- Timeline of EHR.Network's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteoโs incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts EHR.Network Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteoโs MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the EHR.Network breach identified under incident ID EHRJUP1769139018.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of EHR.Network's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ehrnetwork, the number of followers: 1941, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 9 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 685 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on EHR.Network and their customers.
On 14 January 2025, Jupiter Medical Center disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Jupiter Medical Center Third-Party Data Breach".
Jupiter Medical Center disclosed a data breach stemming from a security incident at a third-party electronic health record (EHR) vendor, which may have exposed sensitive patient information.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Third-party EHR vendor systems, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, medical records.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifying potentially affected individuals and providing guidance on protecting personal information.
The case underscores how Under review, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifying potentially affected individuals and providing guidance on protecting personal information.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach stemming from a security incident at a third-party electronic health record (EHR) vendor. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party had accessed the vendorโs systems; EHR systems often use OAuth tokens and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, names, medical records compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data may include names, Social Security numbers, and medical records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party had accessed the vendorโs systems as early as January 22, 2024. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating eHR vendor systems affected; potential for altered medical records and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach; potential for data destruction. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources
- EHR.Network Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: http://www.rankiteo.com/company/ehrnetwork/incident/EHRJUP1769139018
- EHR.Network CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ehrnetwork
- EHR.Network Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ehrjup1769139018-third-party-electronic-health-record-jupiter-medical-center-breach-january-2024/
- EHR.Network CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ehrnetwork/history
- EHR.Network CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://wjno.iheart.com/featured/florida-news/content/2026-01-22-jupiter-medical-center-warns-of-a-data-breach-dating-back-to-jan-2025/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf






