Comparison Overview

EHR.Network

VS

Luxoft

EHR.Network

No.39, 2nd Floor, NGEF Lane, Bangalore, 560038, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://http://ehr.network

EHR.Network is a data-first platform powered by openEHR for various stakeholders of the healthcare ecosystem. EHR.Network unlocks data value by making it accessible and inter-operable for companies and individuals to generate insights, securely within and across organizations. Value creation is linked to data access and use. Value is generated by the insights resulting from asking better questions of data - whether it belongs to companies themselves or to others with whom they can partner. We are an open standards based Healthcare Information Platform. It is aligned to EHR standards and is designed to accept data from any source, normalize them and present them as an integrated, comprehensive EHR data of a person. This person centric EHR data is intended to be freely shareable with any person authorized to view it. The platform provides open APIs and SDKs to enable third parties to develop healthcare related applications that leverage the EHR data on the platform to provide enhanced services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Luxoft

Gubelstrasse 24, Zug, 6300, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.luxoft.com

Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company (NYSE: DXC), is a digital strategy and software engineering firm providing bespoke technology solutions that drive business change for customers the world over. Acquired by U.S. company DXC Technology in 2019, Luxoft is a global operation in 44 cities and 21 countries with an international, agile workforce of nearly 18,000 people. It combines a unique blend of engineering excellence and deep industry expertise, helping over 425 global clients innovate in the areas of automotive, financial services, travel and hospitality, healthcare, life sciences, media and telecommunications. DXC Technology is a leading Fortune 500 IT services company which helps global companies run their mission critical systems. Together, DXC and Luxoft offer a differentiated customer-value proposition for digital transformation by combining Luxoft’s front-end digital capabilities with DXC’s expertise in IT modernization and integration. Follow our profile for regular updates and insights into technology and business needs.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 15,550
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehrnetwork.jpeg
EHR.Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxoft.jpeg
Luxoft
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EHR.Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Luxoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EHR.Network in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luxoft in 2026.

Incident History — EHR.Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EHR.Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Luxoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luxoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehrnetwork.jpeg
EHR.Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxoft.jpeg
Luxoft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Luxoft company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EHR.Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EHR.Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Luxoft company has not reported any.

In the current year, Luxoft company and EHR.Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Luxoft company nor EHR.Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EHR.Network company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Luxoft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Luxoft company nor EHR.Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EHR.Network company nor Luxoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EHR.Network company nor Luxoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Luxoft company employs more people globally than EHR.Network company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Luxoft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References