Comparison Overview

Eessay

VS

Radius magazine

Eessay

EN1 1FG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eessay.co.uk

Eessay specialises in academic proofreading of English text. When submitting text for proofreading, the text is checked against English syntax (grammar) and semantic rules, correct spelling, punctuation, jargon and terminology. We also check the text against the requirements of the institution as well as ensure that the form of the text adheres to the standard of the text receiver.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Radius magazine

46032, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.radthemag.com

Radius is a cutting edge magazine, authored exclusively by physicians. Some of the nation's finest doctors, nutritionists, and therapists have been assembled to bring healthcare topics to our readers. We are true health. We offer the opportunity to our readers to receive professional advice on traditonal and alternative. As millions of boomers begin the aging process and health care takes one giant leap, the need for true and accurate health facts continues to rise. Radius fulfills that need.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eessay.jpeg
Eessay
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Radius magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eessay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Radius magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eessay in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radius magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Eessay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eessay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Radius magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radius magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eessay.jpeg
Eessay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Radius magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Radius magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eessay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Radius magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eessay company.

In the current year, Radius magazine company and Eessay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Radius magazine company nor Eessay company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Radius magazine company nor Eessay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Radius magazine company nor Eessay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eessay company nor Radius magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eessay company nor Radius magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Radius magazine company employs more people globally than Eessay company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eessay nor Radius magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References