Comparison Overview

Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

VS

Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC

Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, 02199, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

On January 10, 2015, Locke Lord LLP and Edward Wildman Palmer LLP combined to create Locke Lord Edwards, a Firm of approximately 1,000 lawyers working from 23 offices to meet clients’ needs around the world. Lawyers at Locke Lord are known for their strength in numerous practice areas, including appellate, aviation, business litigation, class action litigation, corporate and finance transactions, employee benefits, energy, environmental, financial services, fund formation, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, intellectual property, labor and employment, mergers and acquisitions, privacy and data security, private equity, public finance, public law, real estate, regulatory, REIT, tax, technology, telecommunications, and venture capital, among others. As of January 10, Edwards Wildman ceased updating the Edwards Wildman company page. Please join us at the Locke Lord company page, found here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/locke-lord-llp?trk=prof-following-company-logo

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC

701 Seventh Avenue, Belmar, New Jersey, 07719, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC is a 23-attorney law firm, with offices in Belmar, Morristown, Mount Laurel and Trenton, New Jersey. Our practice areas include commercial litigation, governmental relations and regulatory law, municipal law, commercial transactions, real estate and land use, and wills and estate law. PQA is best known for its work in representing the Special Investigation Units (SIU) of insurance companies in challenging complex healthcare insurance fraud schemes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-wildman-palmer-llp.jpeg
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pringle-quinn-anzano-pc.jpeg
Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC in 2025.

Incident History — Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-wildman-palmer-llp.jpeg
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pringle-quinn-anzano-pc.jpeg
Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company.

In the current year, Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company and Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company nor Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company nor Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company nor Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP company employs more people globally than Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP nor Pringle Quinn Anzano, PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X