Comparison Overview

Edwards Label

VS

Discus Print & Signage

Edwards Label

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.edwardslabel.com

Edwards Label is an industry leader that aspires to make a wide range of labels that solve impossible problems and market products in ways that no one else can. We specialize in printing and flexible packaging, and are known by our clients for our quick turnaround time and label creativity. As an employer, we have a strong company culture that seeks to empower our employees to reach their highest potential. Because our company works in a unique niche market of printing, we strongly believe in training and promoting from within and the sky is the limit.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Discus Print & Signage

259 Scarborough Beach Rd, Mount Hawthorn, Western Australia, 6016, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.discus.com.au

Discus Print & Signage is Perth's original and leading large format printing company with a strong reputation for delivering exceptional service and quality products. We work with our clients to deliver customised signage and printing solutions including all outdoor and interior signage, billboards, flags, banners, posters and window and vehicle graphics to name a few! Get in touch with us today! We'd love to hear from you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-label.jpeg
Edwards Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discus-digital-print.jpeg
Discus Print & Signage
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edwards Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Discus Print & Signage
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discus Print & Signage in 2025.

Incident History — Edwards Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Discus Print & Signage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discus Print & Signage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-label.jpeg
Edwards Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discus-digital-print.jpeg
Discus Print & Signage
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edwards Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Discus Print & Signage company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Discus Print & Signage company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edwards Label company.

In the current year, Discus Print & Signage company and Edwards Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Discus Print & Signage company nor Edwards Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Discus Print & Signage company nor Edwards Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Discus Print & Signage company nor Edwards Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edwards Label company nor Discus Print & Signage company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edwards Label company nor Discus Print & Signage company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edwards Label company employs more people globally than Discus Print & Signage company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edwards Label nor Discus Print & Signage holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References