Comparison Overview

EDWARDS

VS

ISS, Inc.

EDWARDS

2700 Bell Avenue, Des Moines, IA, 50321, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

EDWARDS offers a full service of Customized Business Solutions. From quality craftsman offset printing and personalized variable digital printing to full service mailing and fulfillment. We exist to help our clients achieve their marketing goals and have been an indispensable and trusted advisor when it comes to knowing what works and what doesn’t. With fifty years of service in the commercial printing business, we know how to get ink to paper. Choosing the right commercial printer can be difficult. EDWARDS wants to make the choice easy. From flat packaging to high-end quality catalogs and Annual Reports, digital printing and print-on-demand, our production and bindery teams have the experience and expertise to handle any print project for your business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ISS, Inc.

2 Shaker Rd., Shirley, 01464, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

ISS, Inc. offers a full suite of high quality printing and graphic design services. Our products include standard business printing, wide format graphics and signs, and branded promotional items. We prioritize building relationships and and providing exceptional customer service to deliver the best value to our customers. When you choose to work with us, you are gaining a partner who will work with you to understand your project requirements and business objectives to provide an unparalleled customer experience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-inc-.jpeg
EDWARDS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iss-inc.jpeg
ISS, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EDWARDS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ISS, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDWARDS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ISS, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — EDWARDS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDWARDS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ISS, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISS, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-inc-.jpeg
EDWARDS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iss-inc.jpeg
ISS, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EDWARDS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ISS, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ISS, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EDWARDS company.

In the current year, ISS, Inc. company and EDWARDS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ISS, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ISS, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ISS, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EDWARDS company nor ISS, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EDWARDS company nor ISS, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EDWARDS company employs more people globally than ISS, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor ISS, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N