Comparison Overview

EDWARDS

VS

Comdec, Inc.

EDWARDS

2700 Bell Avenue, Des Moines, IA, 50321, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ega.com

EDWARDS offers a full service of Customized Business Solutions. From quality craftsman offset printing and personalized variable digital printing to full service mailing and fulfillment. We exist to help our clients achieve their marketing goals and have been an indispensable and trusted advisor when it comes to knowing what works and what doesn’t. With fifty years of service in the commercial printing business, we know how to get ink to paper. Choosing the right commercial printer can be difficult. EDWARDS wants to make the choice easy. From flat packaging to high-end quality catalogs and Annual Reports, digital printing and print-on-demand, our production and bindery teams have the experience and expertise to handle any print project for your business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Comdec, Inc.

25 Hale Street, Newburyport, MA, 01950, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comdecinc.com

Your Full Service Solution for Commercial Printing Comdec, Inc. · Ruco USA · Standard Machines, Inc. · Digitran, Inc. 30 years of experience in screen printing, pad printing, commercial decorating, methods and materials, means your job is done right, on time, and within budget. And our in-depth knowledge of every process we offer means we solve problems before they can affect your project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-inc-.jpeg
EDWARDS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comdec-inc..jpeg
Comdec, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EDWARDS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comdec, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDWARDS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comdec, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — EDWARDS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDWARDS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comdec, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comdec, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-inc-.jpeg
EDWARDS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comdec-inc..jpeg
Comdec, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both EDWARDS company and Comdec, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Comdec, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EDWARDS company.

In the current year, Comdec, Inc. company and EDWARDS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comdec, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comdec, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comdec, Inc. company nor EDWARDS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EDWARDS company nor Comdec, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EDWARDS company nor Comdec, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EDWARDS company employs more people globally than Comdec, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EDWARDS nor Comdec, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References