Comparison Overview

Edwards Consulting

VS

Student Loan Servicing Alliance

Edwards Consulting

EC
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Over twenty years working with non-governmental organizations and foundations. Professional experience in grantmaking; strategic planning; evaluation; project development and management; research and analysis of social, political and economic dynamics; national and international advocacy initiatives. Post-graduate studies and experience in conflict resolution and justice reform. Professional experience working with grass-roots organizations and movements, international organizations, and in coordination with multi-lateral programs

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Student Loan Servicing Alliance

None, None, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Student Loan Servicing Alliance (SLSA) is a nonprofit, trade association that focuses exclusively on student loan servicing issues. Our servicer members are responsible for servicing over 95% of all federal student loans and the vast majority of private loans, and our membership is a mix of companies, state agencies, non-profits and their service partners.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Edwards Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slsa.jpeg
Student Loan Servicing Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edwards Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Student Loan Servicing Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Student Loan Servicing Alliance in 2025.

Incident History — Edwards Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Student Loan Servicing Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Student Loan Servicing Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Edwards Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slsa.jpeg
Student Loan Servicing Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edwards Consulting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Student Loan Servicing Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Student Loan Servicing Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edwards Consulting company.

In the current year, Student Loan Servicing Alliance company and Edwards Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Student Loan Servicing Alliance company nor Edwards Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Student Loan Servicing Alliance company nor Edwards Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Student Loan Servicing Alliance company nor Edwards Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edwards Consulting company nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edwards Consulting company nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edwards Consulting company employs more people globally than Student Loan Servicing Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edwards Consulting nor Student Loan Servicing Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H