Comparison Overview

Edward Enterprises, Inc.

VS

Reflex Point of Sale

Edward Enterprises, Inc.

240 Puuhale Road, Honolulu, HI, 96819, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ee3.com

Edward Enterprises strives to provide perfect service to all our customers. From the day we first opened for business in 1959, our goal has always been to strive to provide perfect service to all of our customers. You will see this philosophy at work in every one of us, from our sales representatives to our delivery people; and in everything we do, from our Prepress services to our Printing and Distribution capabilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Reflex Point of Sale

Bells Yew Green, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, GB, TN3 9BQ
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reflex-print.co.uk

Reflex Print | Established 1976 | Leading Experts in Lithographic, Screen & Digital Printing Since 1976, Reflex has grown into a premier supplier specializing in lithographic, screen, and digital sheet-fed printing on plastics, paper, and board. We excel in creating standout Point of Sale displays, innovative lenticular concepts, and captivating lenticular projects crafted entirely in-house—from animation to complex 3D effects—leveraging decades of experience to deliver high-quality, eye-catching results. Our extensive in-house finishing capabilities—including die-cutting, guillotining, auto-taping, heat-bending, assembly, and collation—offer exceptional flexibility, allowing us to meet diverse client needs efficiently under one roof. Equipped with state-of-the-art machinery and committed to first-class customer service, Reflex proudly serves a broad client base ranging from entrepreneurs and startups to international companies and major retailers. We’re dedicated to delivering premium products and services that help brands truly stand out. Why Choose Reflex Print? Experience: Over 50 years in the printing industry Comprehensive Services: End-to-end solutions from design to delivery Quality Assurance: State-of-the-art equipment and materials Customer-Centric Approach: Tailored services to meet unique business needs

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edward-enterprises-inc-.jpeg
Edward Enterprises, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reflex-printed-plastics.jpeg
Reflex Point of Sale
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edward Enterprises, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reflex Point of Sale
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edward Enterprises, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reflex Point of Sale in 2025.

Incident History — Edward Enterprises, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edward Enterprises, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reflex Point of Sale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reflex Point of Sale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edward-enterprises-inc-.jpeg
Edward Enterprises, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reflex-printed-plastics.jpeg
Reflex Point of Sale
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edward Enterprises, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reflex Point of Sale company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Reflex Point of Sale company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edward Enterprises, Inc. company.

In the current year, Reflex Point of Sale company and Edward Enterprises, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reflex Point of Sale company nor Edward Enterprises, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reflex Point of Sale company nor Edward Enterprises, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reflex Point of Sale company nor Edward Enterprises, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. company nor Reflex Point of Sale company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. company nor Reflex Point of Sale company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edward Enterprises, Inc. company employs more people globally than Reflex Point of Sale company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edward Enterprises, Inc. nor Reflex Point of Sale holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References