Comparison Overview

Editorial MIC

VS

Raleigh Magazine

Editorial MIC

Artesiano S/N Trobajo del Camino , León, 24010, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://editorialmic.com

Editorial MIC es desde 1994 la compañía española líder en productos corporativos empresariales con unas ventas de 18 M€. Una sólida base tecnológica, innovación permanente, calidad en el proceso, exigencia en la gestión y alta cualificación de sus más de 140 profesionales son los pilares de nuestro éxito. Editorial MIC ha creado una oferta diferencial potenciando el desarrollo de soluciones propias para cada segmento de mercado. Editorial MIC constituye una referencia destacada en los mercados en que opera, tanto a escala nacional como internacional. Con referencias en más de cinco países. Actualmente MIC edita más de 500 publicaciones anuales que se pueden consultar en la sección de productos.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Raleigh Magazine

100 S. Harrington St., Raleigh, NC, 27603, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://raleighmag.com

From legislation to libations, we take you inside the issues, events and flavors that matter most to our city. If it happens in Raleigh, you hear it here first. Honest and passionate, we are the voice of Raleigh. As a multimedia company dedicated to community access, Raleigh Magazine produces 10 print issues per year (subscribe for $10/year or pick up free around town) and daily content to keep you in-the know via web stories, free newsletters with no paywall (Raleigh Insider, Dish on This), a vast multichannel social media presence, and a weekly podcast (Office Talk w/ Raleigh Magazine) that ranks in the top 10% globally.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-mic.jpeg
Editorial MIC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raleigh-magazine.jpeg
Raleigh Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Editorial MIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Raleigh Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editorial MIC in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raleigh Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Editorial MIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editorial MIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Raleigh Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raleigh Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-mic.jpeg
Editorial MIC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raleigh-magazine.jpeg
Raleigh Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Editorial MIC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Raleigh Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Raleigh Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Editorial MIC company.

In the current year, Raleigh Magazine company and Editorial MIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Raleigh Magazine company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Raleigh Magazine company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Raleigh Magazine company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Editorial MIC company nor Raleigh Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Editorial MIC company nor Raleigh Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Editorial MIC company employs more people globally than Raleigh Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Raleigh Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References