Comparison Overview

Editorial MIC

VS

Gardner Business Media, Inc.

Editorial MIC

Artesiano S/N Trobajo del Camino , León, 24010, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://editorialmic.com

Editorial MIC es desde 1994 la compañía española líder en productos corporativos empresariales con unas ventas de 18 M€. Una sólida base tecnológica, innovación permanente, calidad en el proceso, exigencia en la gestión y alta cualificación de sus más de 140 profesionales son los pilares de nuestro éxito. Editorial MIC ha creado una oferta diferencial potenciando el desarrollo de soluciones propias para cada segmento de mercado. Editorial MIC constituye una referencia destacada en los mercados en que opera, tanto a escala nacional como internacional. Con referencias en más de cinco países. Actualmente MIC edita más de 500 publicaciones anuales que se pueden consultar en la sección de productos.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gardner Business Media, Inc.

6915 Valley Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45244, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gardnerweb.com

Gardner Business Media is the premier publisher for the heart of manufacturing in North America – providing unique, one-of-a-kind, relevant information of keen interest to the people who power plants, shops, and factories. Gardner Business Media was founded in 1928 (as Gardner Publications, Inc.) in Cincinnati, Ohio, with the introduction of Modern Machine Shop magazine. To this day, Modern Machine Shop is recognized around the world as the premier metalworking and machine tool publication in North America. Since then, Gardner has built a niche with eight titles focused on one area: manufacturing. We bring industrial buyers and sellers together through our integrated approach to media. Our media brands include Modern Machine Shop, Production Machining, MoldMaking Technology, Automotive Design and Production, Plastics Technology, Products Finishing, High-Performance Composites and Composites Technology. Additionally, Gardner is parent company to Map Your Show (MYS.) Originally offering only its interactive floor plan for trade shows and conferences, MYS has grown to offer an entire suite of show management software solutions. From online, onsite, and mobile support to our print services, MYS offers everything show managers need to successfully execute their shows.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-mic.jpeg
Editorial MIC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardner-business-media-inc-.jpeg
Gardner Business Media, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Editorial MIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gardner Business Media, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editorial MIC in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gardner Business Media, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Editorial MIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editorial MIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gardner Business Media, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gardner Business Media, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-mic.jpeg
Editorial MIC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardner-business-media-inc-.jpeg
Gardner Business Media, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Editorial MIC company and Gardner Business Media, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gardner Business Media, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Editorial MIC company.

In the current year, Gardner Business Media, Inc. company and Editorial MIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gardner Business Media, Inc. company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gardner Business Media, Inc. company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gardner Business Media, Inc. company nor Editorial MIC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Editorial MIC company nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Editorial MIC company nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gardner Business Media, Inc. company employs more people globally than Editorial MIC company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Editorial MIC nor Gardner Business Media, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References