Comparison Overview

EDITORIAL LIMUSA

VS

Iron Library Foundation

EDITORIAL LIMUSA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Libros para toda la vida... Preescolar y primaria Secundaria Medio Superior Superior Arte Auxiliares en educación En los últimos cinco años, Noriega Editores ha signado importantes contratos con reconocidas casas editoriales para ser distribuidor exclusivo de sus obras en la República Mexicana. También, ha firmado convenios de coedición con instituciones muy acreditadas en el ámbito académico, así como con editores de vanguardia. Durante todos estos años Grupo Noriega Editores ha publicado más de 7000 títulos, 1500 de los cuales conforman su catálogo activo. A la fecha, publica alrededor de 120 novedades y 700 reimpresiones al año, con gran penetración en todos los mercados de habla hispana.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Iron Library Foundation

Klostergutstrasse 4, Schlatt, Thurgau, 8252, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Iron Library Foundation brings together 750 years of literature on technology and science in its holdings. It is one of the world‘s largest private specialist libraries for the history of technology and the history of materials and natural sciences. The Iron Library looks after the archives of its benefactor, Georg Fischer Ltd. The GF Corporate Archives are listed as an archive of national importance in the Swiss inventory of cultural assets. Together, the archive and the library maintain the historical and cultural heritage of the GF Corporation. They are part of the cultural, economic and social history of Switzerland.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-limusa.jpeg
EDITORIAL LIMUSA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eisenbibliothek.jpeg
Iron Library Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EDITORIAL LIMUSA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Library Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDITORIAL LIMUSA in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Library Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — EDITORIAL LIMUSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDITORIAL LIMUSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Library Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Library Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-limusa.jpeg
EDITORIAL LIMUSA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eisenbibliothek.jpeg
Iron Library Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EDITORIAL LIMUSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Iron Library Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Iron Library Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EDITORIAL LIMUSA company.

In the current year, Iron Library Foundation company and EDITORIAL LIMUSA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iron Library Foundation company nor EDITORIAL LIMUSA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iron Library Foundation company nor EDITORIAL LIMUSA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iron Library Foundation company nor EDITORIAL LIMUSA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA company nor Iron Library Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Iron Library Foundation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EDITORIAL LIMUSA company.

EDITORIAL LIMUSA company employs more people globally than Iron Library Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EDITORIAL LIMUSA nor Iron Library Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H