Comparison Overview

Editora COC

VS

Laserwords

Editora COC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Em 1987 é uma importante etapa da marca COC: novos gestores dinamizaram ainda mais a atuação do Sistema COC. Em poucos anos, a marca pedagógica, até então caracteristicamente regional, transformar-se-ia em marca nacional. O material didático utilizado pelo COC, desde a sua fundação, sempre foi em forma de apostila produzida e impressa na própria escola. Em função, principalmente dos resultados que conseguia em Ribeirão Preto-SP, algumas escolas passaram a procurar o COC para comprar os materiais didáticos produzidos. Surgiram assim, as primeiras escolas conveniadas e a Editora COC.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laserwords

Adyar, Chennai, India, undefined, undefined, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

SPi Global is a market-leading content technology and content solutions enterprise that provides data services and subject matter expertise (SME) to multiple industries such as research, learning and education, finance, healthcare and life sciences, media and retail, and other corporates. Today, our lives are powered by data and analytics -- when we search for the quickest way to work, when we are fed the latest news bits of interest, and when ads show up on our social media page. Information is aggregated, normalized, semantically enriched and converted to knowledge and intelligence through highly innovative and technical tools. We are the world’s leading provider of content technology solutions in the information industry. We maximize the value of your content with our comprehensive suite of products and solutions, encompassing the extraction, processing, transformation, and enrichment of content.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 282
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Editora COC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laserwords.jpeg
Laserwords
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Editora COC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laserwords
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editora COC in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laserwords in 2025.

Incident History — Editora COC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editora COC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laserwords (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laserwords cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Editora COC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laserwords.jpeg
Laserwords
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laserwords company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Editora COC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laserwords company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Editora COC company.

In the current year, Laserwords company and Editora COC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laserwords company nor Editora COC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laserwords company nor Editora COC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laserwords company nor Editora COC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Editora COC company nor Laserwords company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Editora COC company nor Laserwords company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laserwords company employs more people globally than Editora COC company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Editora COC nor Laserwords holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.