Comparison Overview

EDITEC

VS

Accel Entertainment

EDITEC

114a Cromwell Road, London, London, SW7 4ES, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1997, Editec is a leading provider of management services and technology to Sports Betting, Lottery, and Gaming operators in Africa. The provides services to clients in over 26 Countries from offices in London, Paris, Bucharest, and Gothenberg. Editec consists of three main business streams: Consultancy Services: Provides a wide range of consultancy services across all areas ranging from Business Development, Marketing, IT, Hardware Management, Commercial Analysis, HR and Finance, considerate to all legal and regulatory requirements. Equipment & Technology: The design, manufacture, supply and maintenance of various gaming services and equipment. Software Solutions: The design and development of gaming management software. We provide expertise, guidance and support services to the Network and Retail Operations of well-established African brands, namely Premier Bet & Premier Loto, SBA, Mercury International, Guinée Games and Ogabet. We also work in partnership with an independent Online Service Provider based in Malta offering a comprehensive betting and gaming experience for all our customers. The Team at Editec are passionate, committed and experienced professionals providing expertise and working together to develop maintainable and responsible Lottery, Sports Betting & Gaming activities. We are proud to work closely with numerous partners and local operations, playing a key role in supporting the creation of sustainable jobs and generating new sources of revenue and wealth in the developing markets and communities across Africa.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 556
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Accel Entertainment

P.O. Box 1218, Bolingbrook, IL, 60439, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Accel Entertainment is an industry leader in the distributed gaming market and has been a preferred partner for location owners nationwide since 2012. Our business consists of the installation, maintenance and operation of gaming machines, redemption terminals, and classic amusement devices to bars, restaurants, retail establishments, convenience stores, truck stops, and fraternal organizations across the country. Our goal is to work hand-in-hand with local establishment owners and form meaningful, lasting relationships that will help grow their business and their revenue through our unmatched customer support and industry expertise.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 435
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editec.jpeg
EDITEC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accelentertainment.jpeg
Accel Entertainment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EDITEC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Accel Entertainment
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDITEC in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accel Entertainment in 2025.

Incident History — EDITEC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDITEC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Accel Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accel Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editec.jpeg
EDITEC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accelentertainment.jpeg
Accel Entertainment
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EDITEC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Accel Entertainment company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Accel Entertainment company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EDITEC company.

In the current year, Accel Entertainment company and EDITEC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Accel Entertainment company nor EDITEC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Accel Entertainment company nor EDITEC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Accel Entertainment company nor EDITEC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EDITEC company nor Accel Entertainment company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither EDITEC company nor Accel Entertainment company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EDITEC company employs more people globally than Accel Entertainment company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EDITEC nor Accel Entertainment holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H