Comparison Overview

Edible San Diego

VS

Hazelden Publishing

Edible San Diego

Dove St, San Diego, 92103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Edible San Diego is a multimedia publishing house serving the San Diego County area. Our mission is to create connections between residents, farmers, fishermen, chefs, spirit distillers, wine producers, and other food and beverage producers through our coverage of local issues and stories about our diverse regional food system. We aim to help our readers life their best local life through coverage of great local restaurants, shops, seasonal recipes, farmers markets, natural wellness, regional travel, volunteerism, and local issues in print, online, through social media, and area events. We are always looking for new voices and perspectives. Freelance writers and photographers are encouraged to send pitches to [email protected]

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hazelden Publishing

15251 Pleasant Valley Rd, Center City, 55012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Part of the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, the nation's largest nonprofit treatment provider, Hazelden Publishing is the leading publisher of addiction recovery and self-help resources. We offer a variety of products and services that are rooted in dignity and compassion for those working towards greater health and recovery—from daily meditations to evidence-based programs. In addition to selling inspirational resources to individuals and recovery groups, publishing partners with government agencies, behavioral health organizations, health care systems, and communities to enable transformation with evidence-based services spanning the continuum of care: prevention, intervention, treatment, and recovery.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ediblesandiego.jpeg
Edible San Diego
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hazelden-publishing.jpeg
Hazelden Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Edible San Diego
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hazelden Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edible San Diego in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hazelden Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Edible San Diego (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edible San Diego cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hazelden Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hazelden Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ediblesandiego.jpeg
Edible San Diego
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hazelden-publishing.jpeg
Hazelden Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hazelden Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edible San Diego company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hazelden Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Edible San Diego company.

In the current year, Hazelden Publishing company and Edible San Diego company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hazelden Publishing company nor Edible San Diego company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hazelden Publishing company nor Edible San Diego company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hazelden Publishing company nor Edible San Diego company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Edible San Diego company nor Hazelden Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hazelden Publishing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Edible San Diego company.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Edible San Diego nor Hazelden Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.